These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The safety and efficacy of PCNL with supracostal approach in the treatment of renal stones. Mousavi-Bahar SH; Mehrabi S; Moslemi MK Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Dec; 43(4):983-7. PubMed ID: 21394440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single upper-pole percutaneous access for treatment of > or = 5-cm complex branched staghorn calculi: is shockwave lithotripsy necessary? Wong C; Leveillee RJ J Endourol; 2002 Sep; 16(7):477-81. PubMed ID: 12396440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-Angled Intercostal Percutaneous Access Under Full Expiration: Safety Is Not an Issue Anymore. Ajib KM; Matta IF; Zgheib JT; Jabbour ME J Endourol; 2017 Aug; 31(8):736-741. PubMed ID: 28537426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal. Picus D; Weyman PJ; Clayman RV; McClennan BL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Aug; 147(2):393-7. PubMed ID: 3487960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole renal stone using subcostal access. Aghamir SM; Modaresi SS; Aloosh M; Tajik A J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 21381953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Percutaneous nephrolithotomy through the upper pole calix access for complicated renal calculi: report of 581 cases]. Li HL; Liu CX; Xu AB; Xu K; Chen BS; Guo K; Lin YY; Zhu RL Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2011 Dec; 31(12):2079-81. PubMed ID: 22200717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track. Kyriazis I; Kallidonis P; Vasilas M; Panagopoulos V; Kamal W; Liatsikos E World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 27510761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. Stening SG; Bourne S J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):359-62. PubMed ID: 9726403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients. El-Nahas AR; Shokeir AA; El-Kenawy MR; Shoma AM; Eraky I; El-Assmy AM; Ghaly AM; El-Kappany HA J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):676-80. PubMed ID: 18554648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aggressive approach to staghorn calculi-safety and efficacy of multiple tracts percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Singla M; Srivastava A; Kapoor R; Gupta N; Ansari MS; Dubey D; Kumar A Urology; 2008 Jun; 71(6):1039-42. PubMed ID: 18279934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi. Netto NR; Ikonomidis J; Ikari O; Claro JA Urology; 2005 Apr; 65(4):659-62; discussion 662-3. PubMed ID: 15833502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supracostal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: less morbid, more effective. Sukumar S; Nair B; Ginil KP; Sanjeevan KV; Sanjay BH Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 17899435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal access by sonographer versus urologist during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Wang Y; Lu Z; Hu J; Wang X; Lu J; Hao Y; Wang Y; Chen Q; Jiang F; Zhang H; Xu N; Hou Y; Wang C Urol J; 2014 Jan; 10(4):1035-9. PubMed ID: 24469646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: supra- versus subcostal access. A retrospective study. Radecka E; Brehmer M; Holmgren K; Magnusson A Acta Radiol; 2003 Jul; 44(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 12846698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous nephrostomy, nephrolithotomy and combined ureteroscopic lithotripsy using the supine approach. Kan RW; Fu KK; Wong BT; Ho KL; Yiu MK Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Apr; 19(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 23535674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]