632 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19539110)
1. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of primary versus secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Ramsey SD; Liu Z; Boer R; Sullivan SD; Malin J; Doan QV; Dubois RW; Lyman GH
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18673353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of hospitalization for neutropenic complications of chemotherapy in patients with primary solid tumors receiving pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.
Weycker D; Malin J; Kim J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1069-81. PubMed ID: 19539108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: clinical and economic benefits.
Rader M
Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):16-21. PubMed ID: 16736984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.
Skarlos DV; Timotheadou E; Galani E; Samantas E; Grimani I; Lianos E; Aravantinos G; Xanthakis I; Pentheroudakis G; Pectasides D; Fountzilas G
Oncology; 2009; 77(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19622901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis.
von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Skacel T; Lyman GH; Pousa AL; Bacon P; Easton V; Aapro MS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):608-17. PubMed ID: 19110415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.
Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Termeer E; Severens JL; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 18182670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim on febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia and bone pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Pinto L; Liu Z; Doan Q; Bernal M; Dubois R; Lyman G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Sep; 23(9):2283-95. PubMed ID: 17697451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of primary prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia within community practices in the US.
Hershman D; Hurley D; Wong M; Morrison VA; Malin JL
J Med Econ; 2009 Sep; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19723018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A combined analysis of two pivotal randomized trials of a single dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle and daily Filgrastim in patients with stage II-IV breast cancer.
Siena S; Piccart MJ; Holmes FA; Glaspy J; Hackett J; Renwick JJ
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 12684649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Parthan A; Walli-Attaei M; Chandler DB; Lyman GH
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 24657302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
