These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19539445)

  • 1. Usefulness of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) for persons with other than intellectual disabilities.
    Bossaert G; Kuppens S; Buntinx W; Molleman C; Van den Abeele A; Maes B
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(6):1306-16. PubMed ID: 19539445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factorial validity of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).
    Kuppens S; Bossaert G; Buntinx W; Molleman C; Van den Abbeele A; Maes B
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2010 Jul; 115(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 20597725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (French version).
    Morin D; Cobigo V
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Feb; 47(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19170416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).
    Verdugo MA; Arias B; Ibanez A; Schalock RL
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2010 Nov; 115(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 20946002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the supports intensity scale as a potential assessment instrument for resource allocation for persons with intellectual disability.
    Chou YC; Lee YC; Chang SC; Yu AP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jun; 34(6):2056-63. PubMed ID: 23603067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construct and criterion validities of the Service Need Assessment Profile (SNAP): a measure of support for people with disabilities.
    Guscia R; Harries J; Kirby N; Nettelbeck T; Taplin J
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2006 Sep; 31(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 16954092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Supports Intensity Scale in French.
    Lamoureux-Hébert M; Morin D
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2009 Jan; 114(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 19143464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Support for the construct validity of the Supports Intensity Scale based on clinician rankings of need.
    Weiss JA; Lunsky Y; Tassé MJ; Durbin J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):933-41. PubMed ID: 19264446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilization of the supports intensity scale with psychiatric populations: psychometric properties and utility for service delivery planning.
    Jenaro C; Cruz M; Perez Mdel C; Flores NE; Vega V
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2011 Oct; 25(5):e9-17. PubMed ID: 21978811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Support needs and adaptive behaviors.
    Harries J; Guscia R; Kirby N; Nettelbeck T; Taplin J
    Am J Ment Retard; 2005 Sep; 110(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 16080777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders.
    Andreas S; Harfst T; Dirmaier J; Kawski S; Koch U; Schulz H
    Psychopathology; 2007; 40(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 17215598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The validity of the Supports Intensity Scale for adults with psychiatric disabilities.
    Arnkelsson G; Sigurdsson T
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Dec; 35(12):3665-71. PubMed ID: 25262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Need of Support and Service Questionnaire (NSSQ): a brief scale to assess needs in clients with long-term mental disabilities.
    Jansson L; Wennström E; Wiesel FA
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2005; 59(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 16316899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A psychometric evaluation of a Swedish version of the psychopathology inventory for mentally retarded adults (PIMRA).
    Gustafsson C; Sonnander K
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 15590248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs. staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs. Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample.
    Claes C; Van Hove G; van Loon J; Vandevelde S; Schalock RL
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Apr; 53(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 19207283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.
    Carleton RN; Collimore KC; Asmundson GJ
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 16675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale for Adults With Motor Disability.
    Arnkelsson G; Sigurdsson T
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2016 Mar; 121(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 26914468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The German version of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity in a psychiatric patient sample.
    Grabe HJ; Löbel S; Dittrich D; Bagby RM; Taylor GJ; Quilty LC; Spitzer C; Barnow S; Mathier F; Jenewein J; Freyberger HJ; Rufer M
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 19683612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of the Spanish version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS), in the Mexican population with severe mental illness.
    Ortiz MC; Río CJ; Del Carmen Pérez Rodríguez M; Robaina NF
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2010; 18(5):975-82. PubMed ID: 21120418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.
    Monticone M; Baiardi P; Ferrari S; Foti C; Mugnai R; Pillastrini P; Vanti C; Zanoli G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2090-5. PubMed ID: 19730216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.