BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19540214)

  • 1. An fMRI study of the Tower of London: a look at problem structure differences.
    Newman SD; Greco JA; Lee D
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():123-32. PubMed ID: 19540214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning.
    Newman SD; Pittman G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Apr; 29(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task.
    Berg WK; Byrd DL; McNamara JP; Case K
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 20167413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task.
    Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 15268923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is in a name: comparing the Tower of London with one of its variants.
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U; Kaller CP
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):418-28. PubMed ID: 15820648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Errors of mathematical processing: the relationship of accuracy to neural regions associated with retrieval or representation of the problem state.
    Ravizza SM; Anderson JR; Carter CS
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1238():118-26. PubMed ID: 18786512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endogenous control and task representation: an fMRI study in algebraic problem-solving.
    Stocco A; Anderson JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1300-14. PubMed ID: 18284348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks.
    Kaller CP; Rahm B; Köstering L; Unterrainer JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20723568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planning in Parkinson's disease: a matter of problem structure?
    McKinlay A; Kaller CP; Grace RC; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Anderson TJ; Fink J; Roger D
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):384-9. PubMed ID: 17928014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When planning fails: individual differences and error-related brain activity in problem solving.
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Ruff CC; Spreer J; Krause BJ; Schwarzwald R; Hautzel H; Halsband U
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Dec; 14(12):1390-7. PubMed ID: 15217897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tracing problem solving in real time: fMRI analysis of the subject-paced Tower of Hanoi.
    Anderson JR; Albert MV; Fincham JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1261-74. PubMed ID: 16197682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception.
    Newman SD; Carpenter PA; Varma S; Just MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(12):1668-82. PubMed ID: 12887991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived conflicts and errors in complex problem solving.
    Unterrainer JM; Rauss KS; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Rahm B
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 30(7):816-27. PubMed ID: 18608695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements and visuospatial problem solving: identifying separable phases of complex cognition.
    Kaller CP; Rahm B; Bolkenius K; Unterrainer JM
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Jul; 46(4):818-30. PubMed ID: 19490515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilizing virtual reality to improve the ecological validity of clinical neuropsychology: an FMRI case study elucidating the neural basis of planning by comparing the Tower of London with a three-dimensional navigation task.
    Campbell Z; Zakzanis KK; Jovanovski D; Joordens S; Mraz R; Graham SJ
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2009 Oct; 16(4):295-306. PubMed ID: 20183185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning abilities and chess: a comparison of chess and non-chess players on the Tower of London task.
    Unterrainer JM; Kaller CP; Halsband U; Rahm B
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Aug; 97(Pt 3):299-311. PubMed ID: 16848944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thinking around the corner: the development of planning abilities.
    Kaller CP; Rahm B; Spreer J; Mader I; Unterrainer JM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Aug; 67(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 18440114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation.
    Grabner RH; Ansari D; Reishofer G; Stern E; Ebner F; Neuper C
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(2):346-56. PubMed ID: 17851092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 16478319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related changes in brain activation associated with dimensional shifts of attention: an fMRI study.
    Morton JB; Bosma R; Ansari D
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19457388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.