These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19540321)

  • 1. Assessment factors for extrapolation from short-time to chronic exposure--are the REACH guidelines adequate?
    Malkiewicz K; Hansson SO; Rudén C
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Oct; 190(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19540321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of the subchronic toxicity in the dietary risk assessment of pesticides.
    Zarn JA; Hänggi E; Kuchen A; Schlatter JR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Oct; 58(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of time extrapolation factors based on the database RepDose.
    Batke M; Escher S; Hoffmann-Doerr S; Melber C; Messinger H; Mangelsdorf I
    Toxicol Lett; 2011 Aug; 205(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 21640805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective analysis of the added value of the rat two-generation reproductive toxicity study versus the rat subchronic toxicity study.
    Janer G; Hakkert BC; Piersma AH; Vermeire T; Slob W
    Reprod Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 24(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17600672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extrapolation of available acute and chronic toxicity test data to population-level effects for ecological risk management of chemicals.
    Lin BL; Meng Y
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2009 Jul; 28(7):1557-66. PubMed ID: 19239318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity.
    Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Just who is at risk? The ethics of environmental regulation.
    Simon T
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 30(8):795-819. PubMed ID: 20670991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pediatric susceptibility to 18 industrial chemicals: a comparative analysis of newborn with young animals.
    Hasegawa R; Hirata-Koizumi M; Dourson M; Parker A; Hirose A; Nakai S; Kamata E; Ema M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 17157422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: immunological effects.
    Abadin HG; Chou CH; Llados FT
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 17194513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk assessments for the insect repellents DEET and picaridin.
    Antwi FB; Shama LM; Peterson RK
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 51(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18406029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the uncertainty factor for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation: statistical analysis of toxicity data.
    Pieters MN; Kramer HJ; Slob W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Apr; 27(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 9671565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding toxicity as processes in time.
    Baas J; Jager T; Kooijman B
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(18):3735-9. PubMed ID: 19969324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conversion factors estimating indicative chronic no-observed-adverse-effect levels from short-term toxicity data.
    Kramer HJ; van den Ham WA; Slob W; Pieters MN
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Jun; 23(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 8812968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of developmental toxicity studies in acute exposure assessments: analysis of single-day vs. multiple-day exposure regimens.
    Davis A; Gift JS; Woodall GM; Narotsky MG; Foureman GL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 19306903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deriving a data-based interspecies assessment factor using the NOAEL and the benchmark dose approach.
    Bokkers BG; Slob W
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 37(5):355-73. PubMed ID: 17612951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation of a chronic reference dose and reference concentration for trimethylbenzenes and C9 aromatic hydrocarbon solvents.
    Firth MJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 52(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18809451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal.
    Van Sprang PA; Verdonck FA; Van Assche F; Regoli L; De Schamphelaere KA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(20):5373-91. PubMed ID: 19631966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exposure-triggered reproductive toxicity testing under the REACH legislation: a proposal to define significant/relevant exposure.
    Bernauer U; Heinemeyer G; Heinrich-Hirsch B; Ulbrich B; Gundert-Remy U
    Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jan; 176(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 18068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment factors--applications in health risk assessment of chemicals.
    Falk-Filipsson A; Hanberg A; Victorin K; Warholm M; Wallén M
    Environ Res; 2007 May; 104(1):108-27. PubMed ID: 17166493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the environmental risk of long-chain aliphatic alcohols.
    Belanger SE; Sanderson H; Fisk PR; Schäfers C; Mudge SM; Willing A; Kasai Y; Nielsen AM; Dyer SD; Toy R
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 May; 72(4):1006-15. PubMed ID: 19013645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.