497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19540562)
1. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and preliminary evaluation of the VPS ReplaySuite: a virtual double-headed microscope for pathology.
Johnston DJ; Costello SP; Dervan PA; O'Shea DG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Apr; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15845147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ["Quick Return Service" of the surgical pathology].
Tamai S
Rinsho Byori; 1995 Oct; 43(10):1017-23. PubMed ID: 8531383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with distant pathology demonstrations for clinicians in hospitals without local pathologists through the Swedish telepathology work station.
Boeryd BR
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(4):266-7. PubMed ID: 8526565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services.
Weinstein RS; Bloom KJ; Rozek LS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Jul; 111(7):646-52. PubMed ID: 3606341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local audit of surgical pathology. 18 month's experience of peer review-based quality assessment in an English teaching hospital.
Ramsay AD; Gallagher PJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1992 May; 16(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 1599026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Telepathologic review: utility, diagnostic accuracy, and interobserver variability on a difficult case consultation service.
Raab SS; Robinson RA; Snider TE; McDaniel HL; Sigman JD; Leigh CJ; Thomas PA
Mod Pathol; 1997 Jun; 10(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 9195582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contribution of computers and telepathology in cancerologic pathology].
Martin ED; Dusserre P; Flandrin G; Got C; Vieillefond A; Vacher-Lavenu MC
Bull Cancer; 1995 Dec; 82 Suppl 5():565s-568s. PubMed ID: 8680067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic-robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study.
Dunn BE; Almagro UA; Choi H; Sheth NK; Arnold JS; Recla DL; Krupinski EA; Graham AR; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 1997 Jan; 28(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 9013824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The clinicopathological meeting. A means of auditing diagnostic performance.
McBroom HM; Ramsay AD
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Jan; 17(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8447511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aspects of telepathology in routinary diagnostic work with specific emphasis on ISDN.
Kayser K; Fritz P; Drlicek M
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 8526555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an international telepathology system between Boston (USA) and Dijon: glass slides versus telediagnostic television monitor.
Allaert FA; Weinberg D; Dusserre P; Yvon PJ; Dusserre L; Retaillau B; Cotran P
J Telemed Telecare; 1996; 2 Suppl 1():27-30. PubMed ID: 9375083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Support by telecommunication of decisions in diagnostic pathology. Experience with the first telepathology system in Hungary].
Gombás P; Szende B; Stotz G
Orv Hetil; 1996 Oct; 137(42):2299-303. PubMed ID: 8992427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of an international static-imaging telepathology consultation service.
Halliday BE; Bhattacharyya AK; Graham AR; Davis JR; Leavitt SA; Nagle RB; McLaughlin WJ; Rivas RA; Martinez R; Krupinski EA; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 1997 Jan; 28(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9013826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 32868 frozen sections in 700 hospitals.
Novis DA; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 9199619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reliability of the anatomopathological diagnosis by static image transfer].
Viellefond A; Staroz F; Fabre M; Bedossa P; Martin-Pop V; Martin E; Got C; Franc B
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1995; 43(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 8526560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality assurance goals in surgical pathology.
Rickert RR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1157-62. PubMed ID: 2241527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology.
Rickert RR
Clin Lab Med; 1986 Dec; 6(4):697-706. PubMed ID: 3539481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
