313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19540592)
1. Aggression, science, and law: The origins framework. Introduction.
Victoroff J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(4):189-97. PubMed ID: 19540592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.
Roskies A
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 16901745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Social impact of recent advances in neuroscience].
Mima T
Brain Nerve; 2009 Jan; 61(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19177803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience.
Aharoni E; Funk C; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Gazzaniga M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Mar; 1124():145-60. PubMed ID: 18400929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything.
Greene J; Cohen J
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1775-85. PubMed ID: 15590618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The concept of free will: philosophy, neuroscience and the law.
Pockett S
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 17323343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impulsive versus premeditated aggression: implications for mens rea decisions.
Barratt ES; Felthous AR
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 14502692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The neuroscience of "free will".
Tancredi LR
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 17393401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social attachment and aversion in human moral cognition.
Moll J; Schulkin J
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2009 Mar; 33(3):456-65. PubMed ID: 19126412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neuroethics: the ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience.
Farah MJ
Annu Rev Psychol; 2012; 63():571-91. PubMed ID: 19575613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mens Rea and Methamphetamine: High Time for a Modern Doctrine Acknowledging the Neuroscience of Addiction.
Cusick M
Fordham Law Rev; 2017 Apr; 85(5):2417-49. PubMed ID: 28379674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aggression and moral development: integrating social information processing and moral domain models.
Arsenio WF; Lemerise EA
Child Dev; 2004; 75(4):987-1002. PubMed ID: 15260859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aggressive and prosocial children's emotion attributions and moral reasoning.
Malti T; Gasser L; Buchmann M
Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 18985747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What if? The farther shores of neuroethics: commentary on "Neuroscience may supersede ethics and law".
Greely HT
Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 22926427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Naturalizing Responsibility.
Zullo S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Oct; 25(4):700-11. PubMed ID: 27634721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The roots of goodness: the fulfillment of basic human needs and the development of caring, helping and non-aggression, inclusive caring, moral courage, active bystandership, and altruism born of suffering.
Staub E
Nebr Symp Motiv; 2005; 51():33-72. PubMed ID: 16335738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are you an honest scientist? Truthfulness in science should be an iron law, not a vague aspiration.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2009 Nov; 73(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 19501471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychopathy and instrumental aggression: Evolutionary, neurobiological, and legal perspectives.
Glenn AL; Raine A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 19409615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: a theoretically integrated modeling approach.
de Keijser JW; van der Leeden R; Jackson JL
Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 12210971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
