2181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19541380)
1. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of photon dose calculation algorithms on expected dose distributions in lungs under different respiratory phases.
Fogliata A; Nicolini G; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Winkler P; Cozzi L
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2375-90. PubMed ID: 18421117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments.
Rønde HS; Hoffmann L
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 18803058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
