These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19541421)

  • 1. Experimental observation of the improvement in MTF from backthinning a CMOS direct electron detector.
    McMullan G; Faruqi AR; Henderson R; Guerrini N; Turchetta R; Jacobs A; van Hoften G
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Aug; 109(9):1144-7. PubMed ID: 19541421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of optimal performance at 300keV of three direct electron detectors for use in low dose electron microscopy.
    McMullan G; Faruqi AR; Clare D; Henderson R
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Dec; 147():156-63. PubMed ID: 25194828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detective quantum efficiency of electron area detectors in electron microscopy.
    McMullan G; Chen S; Henderson R; Faruqi AR
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Aug; 109(9):1126-43. PubMed ID: 19497671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.
    Cao Q; Sisniega A; Brehler M; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH; Zbijewski W
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):114-130. PubMed ID: 29095489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional cascaded system analysis of a 50 µm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Vassiljev N; Konstantinidis AC; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1994-2017. PubMed ID: 28072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
    Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography.
    Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
    Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles and prospects of direct high resolution electron image acquisition with CMOS detectors at low energies.
    Faruqi AR
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2009 Aug; 21(31):314004. PubMed ID: 21828565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterisation of the Medipix3 detector for 60 and 80keV electrons.
    Mir JA; Clough R; MacInnes R; Gough C; Plackett R; Shipsey I; Sawada H; MacLaren I; Ballabriga R; Maneuski D; O'Shea V; McGrouther D; Kirkland AI
    Ultramicroscopy; 2017 Nov; 182():44-53. PubMed ID: 28654827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the performance of a hybrid pixel detector with GaAs:Cr sensor for transmission electron microscopy.
    Paton KA; Veale MC; Mu X; Allen CS; Maneuski D; Kübel C; O'Shea V; Kirkland AI; McGrouther D
    Ultramicroscopy; 2021 Aug; 227():113298. PubMed ID: 34051540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile C-Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone-Beam CT imaging performance.
    Sheth NM; Zbijewski W; Jacobson MW; Abiola G; Kleinszig G; Vogt S; Soellradl S; Bialkowski J; Anderson WS; Weiss CR; Osgood GM; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5420-5436. PubMed ID: 30339271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam breast CT with a high pitch (75 μm), thick (500 μm) scintillator CMOS flat panel detector: visibility of simulated microcalcifications.
    Shen Y; Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101915. PubMed ID: 24089917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electron imaging with Medipix2 hybrid pixel detector.
    McMullan G; Cattermole DM; Chen S; Henderson R; Llopart X; Summerfield C; Tlustos L; Faruqi AR
    Ultramicroscopy; 2007; 107(4-5):401-13. PubMed ID: 17140733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of SEM scintillation detector evaluated by modulation transfer function and detective quantum efficiency function.
    Bok J; Schauer P
    Scanning; 2014; 36(4):384-93. PubMed ID: 24323770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SU-E-I-25: Performance Evaluation of a Proposed CMOS-Based X-Ray Detector Using Linear Cascade Model Analysis.
    Jain A; Bednarek D; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3630. PubMed ID: 28519525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A CMOS-based high resolution fluoroscope (HRF) detector prototype with 49.5
    Russ M; Shankar A; Setlur Nagesh SV; Ionita CN; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Feb; 10132():. PubMed ID: 28615792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy.
    Faruqi AR; Henderson R
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2007 Oct; 17(5):549-55. PubMed ID: 17913494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy.
    Faruqi AR; McMullan G
    Q Rev Biophys; 2011 Aug; 44(3):357-90. PubMed ID: 21524337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.