These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1954161)

  • 1. Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test.
    Lykken DT
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):214-22. PubMed ID: 1954161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Control Question Test in polygraphic examinations with actual controls for truth.
    Bradley MT; MacLaren VV; Black ME
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):755-62. PubMed ID: 8961312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tonic arousal during field polygraph tests in guilty vs. innocent suspects in Japan.
    Hira S; Furumitsu I
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19499326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Science and the CQT polygraph. A theoretical critique.
    Saxe L
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 1954162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of antianxiety drugs as countermeasures in the detection of guilty knowledge.
    Iacono WG; Cerri AM; Patrick CJ; Fleming JA
    J Appl Psychol; 1992 Feb; 77(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 1556041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".
    Seymour TL; Seifert CM; Shafto MG; Mosmann AL
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Feb; 85(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 10740954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests.
    Elaad E; Ginton A; Jungman N
    J Appl Psychol; 1992 Oct; 77(5):757-67. PubMed ID: 1429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies.
    Carmel D; Dayan E; Naveh A; Raveh O; Ben-Shakhar G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2003 Dec; 9(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 14664677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alice-in-Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiarly American flight of technological fancy. The CQT polygraph.
    Furedy JJ
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1991; 26(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 1954164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test.
    MacLaren VV
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Aug; 86(4):674-83. PubMed ID: 11519651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trial by polygraph: reconsidering the use of the guilty knowledge technique in court.
    Ben-Shakhar G; Bar-Hillel M; Kremnitzer M
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Oct; 26(5):527-41. PubMed ID: 12412496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception.
    Patrick CJ; Iacono WG
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Nov; 28(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 1816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy rate of lie-detection in China: estimate the validity of CQT on field cases.
    Mao YY; Liang YD; Hu ZQ
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():104-10. PubMed ID: 25447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review.
    Ben-Shakhar G; Elaad E
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Feb; 88(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 12675401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current status of forensic lie detection with the comparison question technique: An update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences report on polygraph testing.
    Iacono WG; Ben-Shakhar G
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):86-98. PubMed ID: 30284848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
    Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alcohol and the physiological detection of deception: arousal and memory influences.
    O'Toole D; Yuille JC; Patrick CJ; Iacono WG
    Psychophysiology; 1994 May; 31(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 8008789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of methods for ERP assessment in a P300-based GKT.
    Abootalebi V; Moradi MH; Khalilzadeh MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):309-20. PubMed ID: 16860894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.