These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19541946)

  • 1. Letter to the editor concerning "320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation" (Siebert E et al: Br J Radiol 2009;82:561-70).
    Siebert E; Bohner G; Dewey M; Hoffmann KT; Mews J; Engelken F; Bauknecht HC; Diekmann C; Masuhr F; Klingebiel R
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 82(979):615. PubMed ID: 19541946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 320-slice CT neuroimaging: initial clinical experience and image quality evaluation.
    Siebert E; Bohner G; Dewey M; Masuhr F; Hoffmann KT; Mews J; Engelken F; Bauknecht HC; Diekmann S; Klingebiel R
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 82(979):561-70. PubMed ID: 19221186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
    Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners.
    Mori S; Endo M; Nishizawa K; Murase K; Fujiwara H; Tanada S
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 79(937):56-61. PubMed ID: 16421406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the heel effect in cone-beam computed tomography: artifacts in standard and novel geometries and their correction.
    Braun H; Kyriakou Y; Kachelriess M; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(19):6005-21. PubMed ID: 20858917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality and patient dose in computed tomography examinations in Greece.
    Simantirakis G; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Dimitriou P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):129-32. PubMed ID: 21743078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.
    Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-quality 3D correction of ring and radiant artifacts in flat panel detector-based cone beam volume CT imaging.
    Anas EM; Kim JG; Lee SY; Hasan MK
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6495-519. PubMed ID: 21934193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artifacts interfering with interpretation of cone beam computed tomography images.
    Makins SR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):485-95. PubMed ID: 24993920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variable pitch reconstruction using John's equation.
    Karbeyaz BU; Naidu RC; Ying Z; Simanovsky SB; Hirsch MW; Schafer DA; Crawford CR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008; 27(7):897-906. PubMed ID: 18599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a non-linear weighted hybrid cone-beam CT reconstruction for circular trajectories.
    Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Oct; 31(7):561-9. PubMed ID: 17689223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography.
    Eggers G; Klein J; Welzel T; Mühling J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):639-44. PubMed ID: 18490090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond.
    Rogalla P; Kloeters C; Hein PA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19195530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Accurate 3D free-form registration between fan-beam CT and cone-beam CT].
    Liang Y; Xu H; Li B; Li H; Yang F
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 29(3):534-40. PubMed ID: 22826954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT radiation dose and image quality.
    Payne JT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RE: De Boer EWJ, Dijkstra PU, Stegenga B, et al. Value of cone-beam computed tomography in the process of diagnosis and management of disorders of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52;2014:241-46.
    Bonte B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 52(9):870-1. PubMed ID: 24923627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.