These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19542506)
21. Effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with and without monensin and tylosin on carcass cutability and meat palatability of beef steers. Hilton GG; Montgomery JL; Krehbiel CR; Yates DA; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Blanton JR; Miller MF J Anim Sci; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1394-406. PubMed ID: 19028853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system. Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content. Font-i-Furnols M; Tous N; Esteve-Garcia E; Gispert M Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 22429803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Scandinavian consumer preference for beef steaks packed with or without oxygen. Aaslyng MD; Tørngren MA; Madsen NT Meat Sci; 2010 Jul; 85(3):519-24. PubMed ID: 20416824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef. Banović M; Grunert KG; Barreira MM; Fontes MA Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20374754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Consumers' willingness to pay for beef direct sales. A regional comparison across the Pyrenees. Sanjuán AI; Resano H; Zeballos G; Sans P; Panella-Riera N; Campo MM; Khliji S; Guerrero A; Oliver MA; Sañudo C; Santolaria P Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):1118-27. PubMed ID: 22406841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties. Wilfong AK; McKillip KV; Gonzalez JM; Houser TA; Unruh JA; Boyle EA; O'Quinn TG J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4943-4958. PubMed ID: 27898955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef. Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Rødbotten R; De Smet S; Scholderer J; Verbeke W Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 21981934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with the purchase of designation of origin lamb meat. Sepúlveda WS; Maza MT; Mantecón AR Meat Sci; 2010 May; 85(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 20374881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Demographics and beef preferences affect consumer motivation for purchasing fresh beef steaks and roasts. Reicks AL; Brooks JC; Garmyn AJ; Thompson LD; Lyford CL; Miller MF Meat Sci; 2011 Apr; 87(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 21159449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Enhancement of beef chuck and loin muscles with ammonium hydroxide and salt. Hamling AE; Calkins CR J Anim Sci; 2008 Apr; 86(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 18192562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phase I of The National Beef Quality Audit-2011: quantifying willingness-to-pay, best-worst scaling, and current status of quality characteristics in different beef industry marketing sectors. Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Pendell DL; Vedral LL; Mafi GG; Moore MC; McKeith RO; Gray GD; Griffin DB; Hale DS; Savell JW; Belk KE J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1907-19. PubMed ID: 23408805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Niche marketing production practices for beef cattle in the United States and prevalence of foodborne pathogens. Fox JT; Reinstein S; Jacob ME; Nagaraja TG Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Oct; 5(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 18681794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Meat standards and grading: a world view. Polkinghorne RJ; Thompson JM Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 20541325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes. Martínez Michel L; Anders S; Wismer WV J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):S469-77. PubMed ID: 22417604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. S-shape relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay premium prices for high quality cured pork products in Spain. Cotes-Torres A; Muñoz-Gallego PA; Cotes-Torres JM Meat Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):814-8. PubMed ID: 22118984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef). Hong JH; Yoon EK; Chung SJ; Chung L; Cha SM; O'Mahony M; Vickers Z; Kim KO J Food Sci; 2011; 76(5):S306-13. PubMed ID: 22417445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory quality of beef patties. Tobin BD; O'Sullivan MG; Hamill RM; Kerry JP Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 22445488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety. Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Verbeke W Meat Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21543160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]