4130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19543373)
1. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.
Howie BN; Donnelly P; Marchini J
PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000529. PubMed ID: 19543373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive evaluation of imputation performance in African Americans.
Chanda P; Yuhki N; Li M; Bader JS; Hartz A; Boerwinkle E; Kao WH; Arking DE
J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 57(7):411-21. PubMed ID: 22648186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies.
Hao K; Chudin E; McElwee J; Schadt EE
BMC Genet; 2009 Jun; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19531258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of genome-wide genotyping and reference panels on rare variants imputation.
Zheng HF; Ladouceur M; Greenwood CM; Richards JB
J Genet Genomics; 2012 Oct; 39(10):545-50. PubMed ID: 23089364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of reference panels and software tools on genotype imputation.
Nho K; Shen L; Kim S; Swaminathan S; Risacher SL; Saykin AJ;
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2011; 2011():1013-8. PubMed ID: 22195161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Founder population-specific HapMap panel increases power in GWA studies through improved imputation accuracy and CNV tagging.
Surakka I; Kristiansson K; Anttila V; Inouye M; Barnes C; Moutsianas L; Salomaa V; Daly M; Palotie A; Peltonen L; Ripatti S
Genome Res; 2010 Oct; 20(10):1344-51. PubMed ID: 20810666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rare variant genotype imputation with thousands of study-specific whole-genome sequences: implications for cost-effective study designs.
Pistis G; Porcu E; Vrieze SI; Sidore C; Steri M; Danjou F; Busonero F; Mulas A; Zoledziewska M; Maschio A; Brennan C; Lai S; Miller MB; Marcelli M; Urru MF; Pitzalis M; Lyons RH; Kang HM; Jones CM; Angius A; Iacono WG; Schlessinger D; McGue M; Cucca F; Abecasis GR; Sanna S
Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Jul; 23(7):975-83. PubMed ID: 25293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comprehensive evaluation of SNP genotype imputation.
Nothnagel M; Ellinghaus D; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Franke A
Hum Genet; 2009 Mar; 125(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19089453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.
Lert-Itthiporn W; Suktitipat B; Grove H; Sakuntabhai A; Malasit P; Tangthawornchaikul N; Matsuda F; Suriyaphol P
BMC Med Genet; 2018 Feb; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 29439659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new strategy for enhancing imputation quality of rare variants from next-generation sequencing data via combining SNP and exome chip data.
Kim YJ; Lee J; Kim BJ; ; Park T
BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1109. PubMed ID: 26715385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genotype Imputation from Large Reference Panels.
Das S; Abecasis GR; Browning BL
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2018 Aug; 19():73-96. PubMed ID: 29799802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of genotype imputation for low frequency and rare variants from the 1000 genomes.
Zheng HF; Rong JJ; Liu M; Han F; Zhang XW; Richards JB; Wang L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116487. PubMed ID: 25621886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-imputation: An efficient method to combine genotype data after imputation with multiple reference panels.
Yu K; Das S; LeFaive J; Kwong A; Pleiness J; Forer L; Schönherr S; Fuchsberger C; Smith AV; Abecasis GR
Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jun; 109(6):1007-1015. PubMed ID: 35508176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genotype-imputation accuracy across worldwide human populations.
Huang L; Li Y; Singleton AB; Hardy JA; Abecasis G; Rosenberg NA; Scheet P
Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Feb; 84(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 19215730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of genetic similarity on imputation accuracy.
Roshyara NR; Scholz M
BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():90. PubMed ID: 26193934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotype imputation for African Americans using data from HapMap phase II versus 1000 genomes projects.
Sung YJ; Gu CC; Tiwari HK; Arnett DK; Broeckel U; Rao DC
Genet Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 36(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 22644746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of genotype imputation strategies using a combined reference panel for chicken population.
Ye S; Yuan X; Huang S; Zhang H; Chen Z; Li J; Zhang X; Zhang Z
Animal; 2019 Jun; 13(6):1119-1126. PubMed ID: 30370890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.
Heidaritabar M; Calus MP; Vereijken A; Groenen MA; Bastiaansen JW
BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():101. PubMed ID: 26282557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of genotype imputations using data from the 1000 Genomes Project.
Sung YJ; Wang L; Rankinen T; Bouchard C; Rao DC
Hum Hered; 2012; 73(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22212296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
