139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19544105)
1. Reliability of speech generating devices: a 5-year review.
Shepherd TA; Campbell KA; Renzoni AM; Sloan N
Augment Altern Commun; 2009; 25(3):145-53. PubMed ID: 19544105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-language pathologists' views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices.
Ballin L; Balandin S; Stancliffe RJ; Togher L
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Oct; 13(5):446-57. PubMed ID: 20969497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children.
Lindsay S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010 May; 5(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 20302418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction of participant characteristics and type of AAC with individuals with ASD: a meta-analysis.
Ganz JB; Mason RA; Goodwyn FD; Boles MB; Heath AK; Davis JL
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 119(6):516-35. PubMed ID: 25354122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing AAC connections with the world.
DeRuyter F; McNaughton D; Caves K; Bryen DN; Williams MB
Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Sep; 23(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 17701744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of augmentative communication devices in the medical management of ALS.
Brownlee A; Palovcak M
NeuroRehabilitation; 2007; 22(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 18198430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-electronic communication aids for people with complex communication needs.
Iacono T; Lyon K; West D
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Oct; 13(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 20583966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: a pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices.
Happ MB; Roesch TK; Kagan SH
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2005 Nov; 32(6):1179-87. PubMed ID: 16270113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech generating devices and modality of short-term word storage.
Dukhovny E; Soto G
Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Sep; 29(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 23927389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of aided AAC interventions on AAC use, speech, and symbolic gestures.
Binger C; Berens J; Kent-Walsh J; Taylor S
Semin Speech Lang; 2008 May; 29(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 18645912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners.
McCall F; Marková I; Murphy J; Moodie E; Collins S
Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(3 Spec No):235-56. PubMed ID: 9474291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multimodality: a basis for augmentative and alternative communication--psycholinguistic, cognitive, and clinical/educational aspects.
Loncke FT; Campbell J; England AM; Haley T
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 28(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 16443580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention.
Light J; McNaughton D
Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Dec; 29(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 24229334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech-driven environmental control systems--a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions.
Judge S; Robertson Z; Hawley M; Enderby P
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 May; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 19378210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Manual motor-plan similarity affects lexical recall on a speech-generating device: implications for AAC users.
Dukhovny E; Gahl S
J Commun Disord; 2014; 48():52-60. PubMed ID: 24630143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of speech-generating devices on the language development of a child with childhood apraxia of speech: a case study.
Lüke C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 24773213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Augmentative and alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury.
Fager S; Hux K; Beukelman DR; Karantounis R
Augment Altern Commun; 2006 Mar; 22(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17114157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Provision of powered communication aids in the United Kingdom.
Judge S; Enderby P; Creer S; John A
Augment Altern Commun; 2017 Sep; 33(3):181-187. PubMed ID: 28695784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computerised communication aid for people with aphasia.
van de Sandt-Koenderman M; Wiegers J; Hardy P
Disabil Rehabil; 2005 May; 27(9):529-33. PubMed ID: 16040556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Augmentative modes of communication for the severely speech- and motor-impaired.
Vanderheiden GC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 May; (148):70-86. PubMed ID: 6445805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
