These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19544726)

  • 41. Revegetation and reproduction: do restoration plantings in agricultural landscapes support breeding populations of woodland birds?
    Belder DJ; Pierson JC; Ikin K; Lindenmayer DB
    Oecologia; 2020 Apr; 192(4):865-878. PubMed ID: 32025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cross-scale monitoring of habitat suitability changes using satellite time series and ecological niche models.
    Arenas-Castro S; Sillero N
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 784():147172. PubMed ID: 34088022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland bird response to fire and grazing.
    Fuhlendorf SD; Harrell WC; Engle DM; Hamilton RG; Davis CA; Leslie DM
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Oct; 16(5):1706-16. PubMed ID: 17069365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. At the Crossroads: Does the Configuration of Roadside Vegetation Affect Woodland Bird Communities in Rural Landscapes?
    Hall M; Nimmo D; Bennett AF
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155219. PubMed ID: 27183227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Local versus landscape spatial influence on biodiversity: a case study across five European industrialized areas.
    Piano E; Isaia M; Falasco E; La Morgia V; Soldato G; Bona F
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Mar; 189(3):126. PubMed ID: 28238172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the impact of revegetation and weed control on urban sensitive bird species.
    Archibald CL; McKinney M; Mustin K; Shanahan DF; Possingham HP
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jun; 7(12):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 28649333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A spatially explicit decision support model for restoration of forest bird habitat.
    Twedt DJ; Uihlein WB; Elliott AB
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Feb; 20(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 16909663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Predicting habitat suitability for rare plants at local spatial scales using a species distribution model.
    Gogol-Prokurat M
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jan; 21(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 21516886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Use of habitats as surrogates of biodiversity for efficient coral reef conservation planning in Pacific Ocean islands.
    Dalleau M; Andréfouët S; Wabnitz CC; Payri C; Wantiez L; Pichon M; Friedman K; Vigliola L; Benzoni F
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):541-52. PubMed ID: 20105207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
    Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hindcasting the impacts of land-use changes on bird communities with species distribution models of Bird Atlas data.
    Regos A; Imbeau L; Desrochers M; Leduc A; Robert M; Jobin B; Brotons L; Drapeau P
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1867-1883. PubMed ID: 30055061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maximizing habitat connectivity in the mitigation hierarchy. A case study on three terrestrial mammals in an urban environment.
    Tarabon S; Bergès L; Dutoit T; Isselin-Nondedeu F
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 243():340-349. PubMed ID: 31103679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bridging the Urban-Rural Divide Between Ecosystem Service Suppliers and Beneficiaries: Using a Distributed Community Nursery to Support Rural Revegetation.
    Bond AJ; Saison CLA; Lawley VR; O'Connor PJ
    Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 64(2):166-177. PubMed ID: 31230102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Integrated models to support multiobjective ecological restoration decisions.
    Fraser H; Rumpff L; Yen JDL; Robinson D; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1418-1427. PubMed ID: 28339135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Identifying wildlife corridors for the restoration of regional habitat connectivity: A multispecies approach and comparison of resistance surfaces.
    Liu C; Newell G; White M; Bennett AF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206071. PubMed ID: 30403713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Species- and sex-specific connectivity effects of habitat fragmentation in a suite of woodland birds.
    Amos N; Harrisson KA; Radford JQ; White M; Newell G; Mac Nally R; Sunnucks P; Pavlova A
    Ecology; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1556-68. PubMed ID: 25039220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Species distribution of kobs (Kobus kob) in the Shai Hills Resource Reserve: an exploratory analysis.
    Antwi RA; Owusu EH; Attuquayefio DK
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):107. PubMed ID: 29387941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
    Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Species mobility and landscape context determine the importance of local and landscape-level attributes.
    Fuentes-Montemayor E; Watts K; Macgregor NA; Lopez-Gallego Z; J Park K
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1541-1554. PubMed ID: 28370641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective.
    Firbank LG; Petit S; Smart S; Blain A; Fuller RJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1492):777-87. PubMed ID: 17785274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.