These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19544762)

  • 1. Ophthalmic applicators: an overview of calibrations following the change to SI units.
    Holmes SM; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1473-7. PubMed ID: 19544762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of NIST and manufacturer calibrations of 90Sr+90Y ophthalmic applicators.
    Soares CG
    Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1487-93. PubMed ID: 8531879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calibration of the 90Sr+90Y ophthalmic and dermatological applicators with an extrapolation ionization minichamber.
    Antonio PL; Oliveira ML; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Feb; 85():11-3. PubMed ID: 24362457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Air kerma standard for calibration of well-type chambers in Brazil using 192Ir HDR sources and its traceability.
    Di Prinzio R; DeAlmeida CE
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):953-60. PubMed ID: 19378756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of a scintillation dosemeter for beta rays using an extrapolation ionization chamber.
    Hakanen AT; Sipilä PM; Kosunen A
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1123-7. PubMed ID: 15191300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between beta radiation dose distribution due to LDR and HDR ocular brachytherapy applicators using GATE Monte Carlo platform.
    Mostafa L; Rachid K; Ahmed SM
    Phys Med; 2016 Aug; 32(8):1007-18. PubMed ID: 27499370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the stability of well-type ionization chamber source strength calibration coefficients.
    Smith BR; DeWerd LA; Culberson WS
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4491-4501. PubMed ID: 32434273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calibration and validation of a quality assurance system for 90Sr/90Y radiation source trains.
    Rosenthal P; Weber W; Förster A; Orth O; Köhler B; Seiler F
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 48(5):573-85. PubMed ID: 12696796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of ophthalmic applicators at NIST: a revised approach.
    Soares CG
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 1921888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility of calibrating elongated brachytherapy sources using a well-type ionization chamber.
    Meigooni AS; Awan SB; Dou K
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4184-9. PubMed ID: 17153397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of dosimetric standards of USA and France for HDR brachytherapy.
    Douysset G; Gouriou J; Delaunay F; DeWerd L; Stump K; Micka J; ;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):1961-78. PubMed ID: 15843730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of air-kerma strength determinations for HDR (192)Ir sources.
    Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Schmidt CR; Micka JA; Dewerd LA
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6721-9. PubMed ID: 22149854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the non-homogeneity of Ir-192 wires in calibration of well chambers.
    Pérez-Calatayud J; Ballester F; Granero D; Brosed A
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 48(23):3961-8. PubMed ID: 14703169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recommendations on detectors and quality control procedures for brachytherapy beta sources.
    Kollaard RP; Dries WJ; van Kleffens HJ; Aalbers TH; van der Marel H; Marijnissen HP; Piessens M; Schaart DR; de Vroome H
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Feb; 78(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16457901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation evaluation of NIST air-kerma rate calibration standard for electronic brachytherapy.
    Hiatt JR; Rivard MJ; Hughes HG
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1119-29. PubMed ID: 26936699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an Australian secondary standard for the reference air kerma rate measurement of 125I seeds.
    Davies JB; Mo L; Alexiev D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 16250476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical quality assurance for 106Ru ophthalmic applicators.
    Kaulich TW; Zurheide J; Haug T; Nüsslin F; Bamberg M
    Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jul; 76(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 15972240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on 103Pd interstitial source calibration and dosimetry: implications for dose specification and prescription.
    Williamson JF; Coursey BM; DeWerd LA; Hanson WF; Nath R; Rivard MJ; Ibbott G
    Med Phys; 2000 Apr; 27(4):634-42. PubMed ID: 10798683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetry of ruthenium-106 ophthalmic applicators with thin layer thermoluminescence dosimeters - Clinical quality control.
    Krause F; Möller M; Risske F; Siebert FA
    Z Med Phys; 2020 May; 30(2):142-147. PubMed ID: 31818650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedures for establishing and maintaining consistent air-kerma strength standards for low-energy, photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the Calibration Laboratory Accreditation Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
    DeWerd LA; Huq MS; Das IJ; Ibbott GS; Hanson WF; Slowey TW; Williamson JF; Coursey BM;
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 15070265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.