These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19544794)

  • 1. Dosimetric verification of a commercial Monte Carlo treatment planning system (VMC++) for a 9 MeV electron beam.
    Schiapparelli P; Zefiro D; Taccini G
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1759-67. PubMed ID: 19544794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for treatment planning.
    Chamberland E; Beaulieu L; Lachance B
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):4636. PubMed ID: 26103470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
    Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Verification and application of the voxel-based Monte Carlo (VMC++) electron dose module of Oncentra MasterPlan].
    Scherf C; Scherer J; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Feb; 183(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 17294112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a commercial VMC++ Monte Carlo based treatment planning system for electron beams using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc simulations and measurements.
    Edimo P; Clermont C; Kwato MG; Vynckier S
    Phys Med; 2009 Sep; 25(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 18722148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.
    Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Weber L; Ginjaume M; Eudaldo T; Jurado D; Ruiz A; Ribas M
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2899-911. PubMed ID: 15543799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
    Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental verification and clinical implementation of a commercial Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculation algorithm.
    Fragoso M; Pillai S; Solberg TD; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Mar; 35(3):1028-38. PubMed ID: 18404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm.
    Zhang A; Wen N; Nurushev T; Burmeister J; Chetty IJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 14(2):4062. PubMed ID: 23470937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photon beam relative dose validation of the DPM Monte Carlo code in lung-equivalent media.
    Chetty IJ; Charland PM; Tyagi N; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Bielajew AF
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):563-73. PubMed ID: 12722808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric verification of a Monte Carlo electron beam model for an add-on eMLC.
    Vatanen T; Traneus E; Lahtinen T
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 18184994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric evaluation of the clinical implementation of the first commercial IMRT Monte Carlo treatment planning system at 6 MV.
    Heath E; Seuntjens J; Sheikh-Bagheri D
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2771-9. PubMed ID: 15543782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set.
    Keall PJ; Siebers JV; Libby B; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 12722809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
    Treutwein M; Bogner L
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo modeling and simulations of the High Definition (HD120) micro MLC and validation against measurements for a 6 MV beam.
    Borges C; Zarza-Moreno M; Heath E; Teixeira N; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):415-23. PubMed ID: 22225311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
    Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning--new issues for clinical consideration.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW; Shokrani P; Cygler JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2781-99. PubMed ID: 16723766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.