These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. Malament KA; Socransky SS J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement. Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements. Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention strength of tin plated gold inlays bonded with two resin cements. Eakle WS; Giblin JM Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 11199614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings. Ergin S; Gemalmaz D J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 12473998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retentive characteristics of dental cementation materials. Hunsaker KJ; Christensen GJ; Christensen RP; Cao D; Lewis RG Gen Dent; 1993 Nov; 41 Spec No():464-7. PubMed ID: 23087930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cement. Yoneda S; Morigami M; Sugizaki J; Yamada T Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15709497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Clayton GH; Driscoll CF; Hondrum SO Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the performance of cast gold bonded restorations in clinical practice, a retrospective study. Jamous I; Sidhu S; Walls A J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 16919861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin. Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents. Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservative and esthetic cast gold fixed partial dentures-inlay, onlay, and partial veneer retainers, custom composite pontics, and stress breakers: part II: utilization of additional retentive features and fabrication of custom pontic facings. Stevenson RG; Refela JA J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 20002923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types. Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]