These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19544948)

  • 21. [Internal validation of a measurement scale: relation between principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient].
    Moret L; Mesbah M; Chwalow J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1993; 41(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 8493397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel's (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients.
    Ponterotto JG; Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):878-86. PubMed ID: 19725323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Semi-parametric differential expression analysis via partial mixture estimation.
    Rossell D; Guerra R; Scott C
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article15. PubMed ID: 18454730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust location and spread measures for nonparametric probability density function estimation.
    López-Rubio E
    Int J Neural Syst; 2009 Oct; 19(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 19885963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha.
    Sijtsma K
    Psychometrika; 2009 Mar; 74(1):107-120. PubMed ID: 20037639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Sample size determination given data of preliminary experiment for student's t-test, ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison].
    Hashimoto T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2004 Aug; 75(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 15745067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability.
    Peterson RA; Kim Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 23127213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On mean-sigma estimators and bias.
    Baldwin P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 22571589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rank-permutation tests for behavior analysis, and a test for trend allowing unequal data numbers for each subject.
    Elliffe D; Elliffe M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):342-358. PubMed ID: 30734313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stuart's tau measure of effect size for ordinal variables: some methodological considerations.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Zahran S; Mielke PW
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1144-8. PubMed ID: 19897822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A priori reliability of tests with cut score.
    Magnano G; Tannoia C; Andrà C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Mar; 80(1):44-64. PubMed ID: 24310845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of exposure imprecision on estimation of the benchmark dose.
    Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1689-96. PubMed ID: 15660622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Internal consistency reliability is a poor predictor of responsiveness.
    Puhan MA; Bryant D; Guyatt GH; Heels-Ansdell D; Schünemann HJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 May; 3():33. PubMed ID: 15877824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Big Data, Small Sample.
    Gerlovina I; van der Laan MJ; Hubbard A
    Int J Biostat; 2017 May; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28599385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph.
    Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Empirical Bayesian estimation in the logistic model.
    Komenda S
    Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med; 1987; 117():317-27. PubMed ID: 2977700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using Lancaster's mid-P correction to the Fisher's exact test for adverse impact analyses.
    Biddle DA; Morris SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):956-65. PubMed ID: 21688881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A note on permutation tests of significance for multiple regression coefficients.
    Long MA; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 17564207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exact and resampling probability values for measures associated with ordered r by c contingency tables.
    Berry KJ; Johnston JE; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Aug; 99(1):231-8. PubMed ID: 17037473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Approximate sample size calculations with microarray data: an illustration.
    Ferreira JA; Zwinderman A
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article25. PubMed ID: 17049036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.