These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19545484)

  • 1. Investigating the relationship between item exposure and test overlap: item sharing and item pooling.
    Chen SY; Lei PW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):205-26. PubMed ID: 19545484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Controlling item exposure and test overlap on the fly in computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen SY; Lei PW; Liao WH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):471-92. PubMed ID: 17650362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):493-513. PubMed ID: 17681109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing.
    Chen SY; Doong SH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):75-91. PubMed ID: 18482476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations.
    Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations.
    O'Neill T; Lunz ME; Thiede K
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 12029175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing.
    Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Veldkamp BP
    Psicothema; 2009 May; 21(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 19403088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Item selection rules in a Computerized Adaptive Test for the assessment of written English].
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 17296125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing with the partial credit model.
    Davis LL; Dodd BG
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 18180546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.