These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19546333)
1. Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasonography: imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Liu H; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q; Chang XY J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Jul; 28(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 19546333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of different histopathologic types of breast cancer. Wang X; Xu P; Wang Y; Grant EG Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 21498359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses? Sorelli PG; Cosgrove DO; Svensson WE; Zaman N; Satchithananda K; Barrett NK; Lim AK J Clin Ultrasound; 2010 May; 38(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 20146214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 127 Cases. Li W; Zhou Q; Xia S; Wu Y; Fei X; Wang Y; Tao L; Fan J; Zhou W J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 31206200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Jiang YX; Liu H; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q; Chang XY Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1873-81. PubMed ID: 17686569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results. Lee SC; Tchelepi H; Grant E; Desai B; Luo C; Groshen S; Hovanessian-Larsen L J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Sep; 38(9):2259-2273. PubMed ID: 30597640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Papillary breast lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: morphological enhancement patterns and diagnostic strategy. Xia HS; Wang X; Ding H; Wen JX; Fan PL; Wang WP Eur Radiol; 2014 Dec; 24(12):3178-90. PubMed ID: 25149297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics of breast cancer: correlation with prognostic factors. Cao XL; Bao W; Zhu SG; Wang LH; Sun MH; Wang L; Men YM; Xue J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24207087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent. Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: initial observations. Liu H; Jiang YX; Liu JB; Zhu QL; Sun Q Breast; 2008 Oct; 17(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 18534851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease. Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative, quantitative and combination score systems in differential diagnosis of breast lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Wang Y; Fan W; Zhao S; Zhang K; Zhang L; Zhang P; Ma R Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26724648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ricci P; Cantisani V; Ballesio L; Pagliara E; Sallusti E; Drudi FM; Trippa F; Calascibetta F; Erturk SM; Modesti M; Passariello R Ultraschall Med; 2007 Feb; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17304413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of the breast: a literature review. Drudi FM; Cantisani V; Gnecchi M; Malpassini F; Di Leo N; de Felice C Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E1-E7. PubMed ID: 22623129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidentally detected splenic lesions in ultrasound: does contrast-enhanced ultrasonography improve the differentiation of benign hemangioma/hamartoma from malignant lesions? Stang A; Keles H; Hentschke S; von Seydewitz CU; Dahlke J; Habermann C; Wessling J Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32(6):582-92. PubMed ID: 22161555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions. Kook SH; Kwag HJ J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis. Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging of fibrotic changes of breast disease: correlations between elastography findings and pathologic and short Tau inversion recovery imaging results, including the enhancement ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient. Matsubayashi RN; Imanishi M; Nakagawa S; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Momosaki S; Muranaka T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25299798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]