These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19546807)

  • 21. Cortical auditory evoked potential (P1): a potential objective indicator for auditory rehabilitation outcome.
    Thabet MT; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 76(12):1712-8. PubMed ID: 22939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.
    Golding M; Taylor A; Cupples L; Mitchell P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 16518141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing-impaired listeners show increased audiovisual benefit when listening to speech in noise.
    Puschmann S; Daeglau M; Stropahl M; Mirkovic B; Rosemann S; Thiel CM; Debener S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():261-268. PubMed ID: 30978494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children.
    Wunderlich JL; Cone-Wesson BK; Shepherd R
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):185-202. PubMed ID: 16459037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: an ERP study.
    Coch D; Skendzel W; Neville HJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2184-203. PubMed ID: 16043399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Seeing sounds and hearing colors: an event-related potential study of auditory-visual synesthesia.
    Goller AI; Otten LJ; Ward J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1869-81. PubMed ID: 18823243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Pathophysiology of auditory and speech perception].
    Dauman R
    Rev Prat; 2009 May; 59(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 19552199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms.
    Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of hearing aids and age-related hearing loss on auditory plasticity across three months - An electrical neuroimaging study.
    Giroud N; Lemke U; Reich P; Matthes KL; Meyer M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():162-175. PubMed ID: 28705608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of very slow rates of stimulus presentation on event-related potential estimates of hearing threshold.
    Muller-Gass A; Marcoux A; Jamshidi P; Campbell K
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jan; 47(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18196485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers M; Spehar B; Myerson J; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 20473178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of visual reliability on auditory-visual integration: an event-related potential study.
    Liu Q; Qiu J; Chen A; Yang J; Zhang Q; Sun HJ
    Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1861-5. PubMed ID: 18090327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The contribution of family history to hearing loss in an older population.
    McMahon CM; Kifley A; Rochtchina E; Newall P; Mitchell P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 18469720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Smoke alarms for sleeping adults who are hard-of-hearing: comparison of auditory, visual, and tactile signals.
    Bruck D; Thomas IR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19125029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Auditory processing in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Kumar AU; Jayaram M
    Behav Brain Funct; 2005 Dec; 1():21. PubMed ID: 16321163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of middle latency responses in presbycusis patients with two different speech recognition scores.
    Kirkim G; Madanoglu N; Akdas F; Serbetcioglu MB
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Dec; 34(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 17467218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the brain.
    Tremblay K; Ross B
    J Commun Disord; 2007; 40(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 17433356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Grant KW; Tufts JB; Greenberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1164-76. PubMed ID: 17348537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-modal processing of auditory-visual stimuli in a no-task paradigm: a topographic event-related potential study.
    Vidal J; Giard MH; Roux S; Barthélémy C; Bruneau N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 119(4):763-71. PubMed ID: 18289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.