These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19546829)

  • 1. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
    Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.
    Kiefer J; Böhnke F; Adunka O; Arnold W
    Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 16962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term evaluation of the effect of intracochlear steroid deposition on electrode impedance in cochlear implant patients.
    De Ceulaer G; Johnson S; Yperman M; Daemers K; Offeciers FE; O'Donoghue GM; Govaerts PJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):769-74. PubMed ID: 14501455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
    Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term performance of transvenous, steroid-eluting, high impedance, passive-fixation ventricular pacing leads.
    Yeh KH; Wang CC; Wen MS; Chou CC; Yeh SJ; Wu D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1399-404. PubMed ID: 15511249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Sep; 135(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16949967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Impedance changes in cochlear implant users].
    Zadrozniak M; Szymański M; Siwiec H; Broda T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 21916223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biologic safety of the Cochlear Corporation multiple-electrode intracochlear implant.
    Webb RL; Clark GM; Shepherd RK; Franz BK; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1988 Jan; 9(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 3364540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Monitoring of implant electrode impedance].
    Petrov SM; Shchukina AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2011; (2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21512482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Results with the Contour cochlear implant in patients with cochlear otosclerosis].
    Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Jul; 83(7):457-60. PubMed ID: 15257495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical case study review: steroid-responsive change in electrode impedance.
    Wolfe J; Baker RS; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23295725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.