These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19548174)

  • 1. Memory conjunction errors: the effects of presentation duration and study repetition.
    Leding JK; Lampinen JM
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):597-607. PubMed ID: 19548174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: little evidence for recollection.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 11911393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conjunction errors in recognition memory: modality-free errors for older adults but not for young adults.
    Jones TC; Jacoby LL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 15876419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.
    Jones TC
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 16020379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decrease in conjunction error rates across lags on a continuous recognition task: a robust pattern.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1726-40. PubMed ID: 18942037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory conjunction clusters: Influence of familiarity and recollection.
    Leding JK
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 26284615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm.
    Lampinen JM; Odegard TN; Neuschatz JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):332-42. PubMed ID: 14979808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of retention intervals on receiver operating characteristics in artificial grammar learning.
    Tunney RJ; Bezzina G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 16899208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials.
    Opitz B; Cornell S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 16989559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetoencephalographic correlates of different levels in subjective recognition memory.
    Staresina BP; Bauer H; Deecke L; Walla P
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 15927488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition.
    Van Strien JW; Hagenbeek RE; Stam CJ; Rombouts SA; Barkhof F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):952-9. PubMed ID: 15955505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: an electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory.
    Wiegand I; Bader R; Mecklinger A
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1360():106-18. PubMed ID: 20816760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Context-dependent repetition effects on recognition memory.
    Opitz B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jul; 73(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 20493623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hippocampal involvement in recollection but not familiarity across time: a prospective study.
    Suchan B; Gayk AE; Schmid G; Köster O; Daum I
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 17932973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Groh-Bordin C; Zimmer HD; Ecker UK
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1879-90. PubMed ID: 16777433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.
    Jones TC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 16478341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.