374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19548411)
1. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication.
Maeda Y; Satoh T; Sogo M
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 33(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 16409521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.
Ha CY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Choi JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21365037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the compressive strength of 3 different implant design systems.
Pedroza JE; Torrealba Y; Elias A; Psoter W
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17410905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.
Wiskott HW; Jaquet R; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 17465350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.
Piermatti J; Yousef H; Luke A; Mahevich R; Weiner S
Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 17172962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Strub JR; Gerds T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Freitas-Júnior AC; Rocha EP; Bonfante EA; Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Martini AP; Assunção WG; Silva NR; Coelho PG
Dent Mater; 2012 Oct; 28(10):e218-28. PubMed ID: 22682782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
