143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19548798)
1. Evaluation of trajectory planning models for arm-reaching movements based on energy cost.
Nishii J; Taniai Y
Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2634-47. PubMed ID: 19548798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The minimum endpoint variance trajectory depends on the profile of the signal-dependent noise.
Iguchi N; Sakaguchi Y; Ishida F
Biol Cybern; 2005 Apr; 92(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 15765212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different predictions by the minimum variance and minimum torque-change models on the skewness of movement velocity profiles.
Tanaka H; Tai M; Qian N
Neural Comput; 2004 Oct; 16(10):2021-40. PubMed ID: 15333205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum acceleration criterion with constraints implies bang-bang control as an underlying principle for optimal trajectories of arm reaching movements.
Ben-Itzhak S; Karniel A
Neural Comput; 2008 Mar; 20(3):779-812. PubMed ID: 18045017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object grasping using the minimum variance model.
Simmons G; Demiris Y
Biol Cybern; 2006 May; 94(5):393-407. PubMed ID: 16479397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning and generation of goal-directed arm reaching from scratch.
Kambara H; Kim K; Shin D; Sato M; Koike Y
Neural Netw; 2009 May; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 19121565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of viscous loads on motor planning.
Thoroughman KA; Wang W; Tomov DN
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 98(2):870-7. PubMed ID: 17522176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of execution noise in movement variability.
van Beers RJ; Haggard P; Wolpert DM
J Neurophysiol; 2004 Feb; 91(2):1050-63. PubMed ID: 14561687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal control of redundant muscles in step-tracking wrist movements.
Haruno M; Wolpert DM
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4244-55. PubMed ID: 16079196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal trajectory formation of constrained human arm reaching movements.
Ohta K; Svinin MM; Luo Z; Hosoe S; Laboissière R
Biol Cybern; 2004 Jul; 91(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 15309545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model.
Torres EB; Zipser D
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Nov; 88(5):2355-67. PubMed ID: 12424277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field.
Gentili R; Cahouet V; Papaxanthis C
Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 17224242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Properties of synergies arising from a theory of optimal motor behavior.
Chhabra M; Jacobs RA
Neural Comput; 2006 Oct; 18(10):2320-42. PubMed ID: 16907628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using arm configuration to learn the effects of gyroscopes and other devices.
Flanders M; Hondzinski JM; Soechting JF; Jackson JC
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):450-9. PubMed ID: 12522193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kinematic invariants during cyclical arm movements.
Dounskaia N
Biol Cybern; 2007 Feb; 96(2):147-63. PubMed ID: 17031664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. II. A maximum smoothness model.
Pham QC; Hicheur H; Arechavaleta G; Laumond JP; Berthoz A
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 26(8):2391-403. PubMed ID: 17953626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model.
Nakano E; Imamizu H; Osu R; Uno Y; Gomi H; Yoshioka T; Kawato M
J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2140-55. PubMed ID: 10322055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching.
Scheidt RA; Ghez C
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 98(6):3600-13. PubMed ID: 17913996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior.
Goble JA; Zhang Y; Shimansky Y; Sharma S; Dounskaia NV
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 98(3):1240-52. PubMed ID: 17625062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computing movement geometry: a step in sensory-motor transformations.
Zipser D; Torres E
Prog Brain Res; 2007; 165():411-24. PubMed ID: 17925261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
