BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19549117)

  • 1. The number of negative pelvic lymph nodes removed does not affect the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Murphy AM; Berkman DS; Desai M; Benson MC; McKiernan JM; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2010 Jan; 105(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 19549117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Schiavina R; Manferrari F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Vagnoni V; Guidi M; Borghesi M; Baccos A; Morselli-Labate AM; Concetti S; Martorana G
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8):1262-8. PubMed ID: 21446934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
    Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathological and oncologic outcomes for men with positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy: The Johns Hopkins Hospital 30-year experience.
    Pierorazio PM; Gorin MA; Ross AE; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Bivalacqua TJ
    Prostate; 2013 Nov; 73(15):1673-80. PubMed ID: 24019101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does increasing the nodal yield improve outcomes in contemporary patients without nodal metastasis undergoing radical prostatectomy?
    Kluth LA; Xylinas E; Rieken M; Chun FK; Fajkovic H; Becker A; Karakiewicz PI; Passoni N; Herman M; Lotan Y; Seitz C; Schramek P; Remzi M; Loidl W; Guillonneau B; Rouprêt M; Briganti A; Scherr DS; Graefen M; Tewari AK; Shariat SF
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):47.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24055425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcomes of salvage treatment in lymph node-positive prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.
    Kim D; Kim DY; Kim JS; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256778. PubMed ID: 34506516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.
    Seyedin SN; Mitchell DL; Mott SL; Russo JK; Tracy CR; Snow AN; Parkhurst JR; Smith MC; Buatti JM; Watkins JM
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2019 Jan; 25(1):209-215. PubMed ID: 29079967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.
    Preisser F; Bandini M; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Fossati N; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2018 May; 78(6):469-475. PubMed ID: 29460290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.
    Steuber T; Budäus L; Walz J; Zorn KC; Schlomm T; Chun F; Ahyai S; Fisch M; Sauter G; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1755-61. PubMed ID: 20942833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Algorithm for selecting men for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy based on clinical risk factors in an Australian population.
    Sengupta S; Weerakoon M; Sethi K; Ischia J; Webb DR
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():48-51. PubMed ID: 22458494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
    Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
    Sivaraman A; Benfante N; Touijer K; Coleman J; Scardino P; Laudone V; Eastham J
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 29520383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.
    Banapour P; Schumacher A; Lin JC; Finley DS
    Perm J; 2019; 23():. PubMed ID: 30939263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the extent of lymph-node dissection on biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy in node-negative patients.
    Schiavina R; Bertaccini A; Franceschelli A; Manferrari F; Vagnoni V; Borghesi M; Morselli-Labate AM; Martorana G
    Anticancer Res; 2010 Jun; 30(6):2297-302. PubMed ID: 20651383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. KLK3 and TMPRSS2 for molecular lymph-node staging in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Lunger L; Retz M; Bandur M; Souchay M; Vitzthum E; Jäger M; Weirich G; Schuster T; Autenrieth M; Kübler H; Maurer T; Thalgott M; Herkommer K; Koll F; Gschwend JE; Nawroth R; Heck MM
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 32978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.
    Narita T; Koie T; Ookubo T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yamamoto H; Inoue T; Hatakeyama S; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
    Med Oncol; 2017 Jan; 34(1):1. PubMed ID: 27889880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.