These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19550244)

  • 1. Differences in the quality of information on the internet about lung cancer between the United States and Japan.
    Goto Y; Sekine I; Sekiguchi H; Yamada K; Nokihara H; Yamamoto N; Kunitoh H; Ohe Y; Tamura T
    J Thorac Oncol; 2009 Jul; 4(7):829-33. PubMed ID: 19550244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer.
    López-Jornet P; Camacho-Alonso F
    Oral Oncol; 2009 Sep; 45(9):e95-8. PubMed ID: 19457707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.
    Lawrentschuk N; Sasges D; Tasevski R; Abouassaly R; Scott AM; Davis ID
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):706-13. PubMed ID: 22146882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.
    Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
    Sambandam SN; Ramasamy V; Priyanka P; Ilango B
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the internet.
    Beaton C; Codd RJ; Holland PA; Gateley CA
    Breast J; 2008; 14(4):366-8. PubMed ID: 18537915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Internet information on the controversial X-Stop device.
    Anderson JT; Sullivan TB; Ahn UM; Ahn NU
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2412-9. PubMed ID: 24509178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What do patients know about their low back pain? An analysis of the quality of information available on the Internet.
    Galbusera F; Brayda-Bruno M; Freutel M; Seitz A; Steiner M; Wehrle E; Wilke HJ
    Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 23187011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.
    Pusz MD; Brietzke SE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Sep; 147(3):462-5. PubMed ID: 22597577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Internet information availability about facial nerve paralysis].
    Suzuki J; Kobayashi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2010 Nov; 113(11):844-50. PubMed ID: 21174731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical evaluation of Web sites offering patient information on tinnitus.
    Kieran SM; Skinner LJ; Donnelly M; Smyth DA
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Jan; 89(1):E11-4. PubMed ID: 20155682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surfing for mouth guards: assessing quality of online information.
    Magunacelaya MB; Glendor U
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):334-43. PubMed ID: 21635690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
    Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.
    Sheran J; Dachman AH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):593-7. PubMed ID: 18359448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health information quality on the internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation.
    Lawrentschuk N; Abouassaly R; Hackett N; Groll R; Fleshner NE
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1058-63. PubMed ID: 19758687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of internet sites for burn scar management.
    Bohacek L; Gomez M; Fish JS
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(4):246-51; discussion 245. PubMed ID: 14501424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the quality of epilepsy education on the Canadian World Wide Web.
    Burneo JG
    Epilepsy Behav; 2006 Feb; 8(1):299-302. PubMed ID: 16275110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic internet-based review of complementary and alternative medicine for glaucoma.
    Gunasekera V; Ernst E; Ezra DG
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):435-439.e2. PubMed ID: 17900696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donor information for living donor liver transplantation: where can comprehensive information be found?
    Melloul E; Raptis DA; Oberkofler CE; Dutkowski P; Lesurtel M; Clavien PA
    Liver Transpl; 2012 Aug; 18(8):892-900. PubMed ID: 22467198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.