132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1955060)
1. Red colour comparison perimetry chart in neuro-ophthalmological examination.
Mutlukan E; Cullen JF
Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 3)():352-61. PubMed ID: 1955060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral homonymous hemianopia: correlation between lesion location and visual field defects by means of cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.
Papageorgiou E; Ticini LF; Schiefer U
J Neuroophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 21623227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Modified technics for the examination of the central visual field].
Richard G
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 2376381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.
Satgunam P; Apfelbaum HL; Peli E
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1265-75. PubMed ID: 22922780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [New technics of examining the central visual field].
Richard G
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1989; 12(10):635-40. PubMed ID: 2638357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of the central visual field by the Friedmann Mark I analyzer and color vision in 85 patients with multiple sclerosis. Correlation with visual evoked potentials in 50 cases].
Grochowicki M; Vighetto A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 3385126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of confrontation visual field tests.
Kerr NM; Chew SS; Eady EK; Gamble GD; Danesh-Meyer HV
Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(15):1184-90. PubMed ID: 20385890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Conventional perimetry I: introduction--basics].
Schiefer U; Pätzold J; Dannheim F
Ophthalmologe; 2005 Jun; 102(6):627-44; quiz 645-6. PubMed ID: 15906041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scotoma perception in white-noise-field campimetry and postchiasmal visual pathway lesions.
Kolb M; Petersen D; Schiefer U; Kolb R; Skalej M
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 7492935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Color contrast perimetry. The spatial distribution of color defects in optic nerve and retinal diseases.
Hart WM; Burde RM
Ophthalmology; 1985 Jun; 92(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 4034172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination].
Aulhorn E; Köst G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 3404938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].
Schiefer U; Pätzold J; Dannheim F
Ophthalmologe; 2005 Aug; 102(8):821-7; quiz 828-9. PubMed ID: 16044280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Visual field disturbances and their significance in neurologic diagnosis].
Harms H
Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd; 1965 Aug; 187(5):423-45. PubMed ID: 5838144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of testing visual fields by confrontation.
Pandit RJ; Gales K; Griffiths PG
Lancet; 2001 Oct; 358(9290):1339-40. PubMed ID: 11684217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new apparatus for visual field testing with binocular fixation.
Hasegawa E
Acta Med Okayama; 1978 Jul; 32(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 151490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
