These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1955060)

  • 21. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures.
    Vandeveer MR; Norden LC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Central field perimetry of discriminated targets: I. Results for normal individuals using high-contrast targets.
    Yavuz GA; Unver YB; Bekiroglu N; Presti P; Sinclair SH
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Nov; 23(11):2082-9. PubMed ID: 19648898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiology and colour perimetry in dominant infantile optic atrophy.
    Berninger TA; Jaeger W; Krastel H
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Jan; 75(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 1991088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Photopic tangential perimetry.
    Elenius V; Leinonen M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Apr; 64(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 3727949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Results of static perimetry in subclinical optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis].
    Mauguière F; Perret-Magloire E
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1983; 139(12):745-52. PubMed ID: 6665389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using Humphrey Matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Gomes PR; Pierre ET; Pierre LM
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):851-6. PubMed ID: 19680272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subclinical optic neuropathy in Fabry disease.
    Pitz S; Grube-Einwald K; Renieri G; Reinke J
    Ophthalmic Genet; 2009 Dec; 30(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 19852573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmological Function Diagnostics: Indication - Methods - Topodiagnostic Aspects].
    Ungewiss J; Schiefer U
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2018 Nov; 235(11):1218-1228. PubMed ID: 30326540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].
    Grehn F; Burkard G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Nov; 193(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 3210646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Friedmann visual field analyser tested on neuro-ophthalmological cases.
    Bynke H; Nordenfelt L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1974; 52(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 4480333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry.
    Wall M; Neahring RK; Woodward KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.
    Watanabe K; Shinoda K; Kimura I; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y; Ohde H
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 17184719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fluctuations of visual field interpretation related to cluster and scotoma analysis by one interpreter.
    Fankhauser F 1st ; Fankhauser F; Larsen SE; Cruz-Orive LM
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jan; 3(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8142880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The four-meter confrontation visual field test.
    Kodsi SR; Younge BR
    J Clin Neuroophthalmol; 1993 Mar; 13(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 8501261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between local glaucomatous visual field defects and loss of nerve fiber layer thickness measured with polarimetry and spectral domain OCT.
    Horn FK; Mardin CY; Laemmer R; Baleanu D; Juenemann AM; Kruse FE; Tornow RP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):1971-7. PubMed ID: 19151389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The neuro-ophthalmic examination.
    Beck RW; Smith CH
    Neurol Clin; 1983 Nov; 1(4):807-30. PubMed ID: 6680174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Angioscotometry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Comparison of the effect of different wavelengths.
    Remky A; Beausencourt E; Elsner AE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Oct; 37(11):2350-5. PubMed ID: 8843920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.