These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19551481)
41. Zeta diversity patterns in metabarcoded lotic algal assemblages as a tool for bioassessment. Simons AL; Theroux S; Osborne M; Nuzhdin S; Mazor R; Steele J Ecol Appl; 2023 Apr; 33(3):e2812. PubMed ID: 36708145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Impacts of rapid urbanization on the water quality and macroinvertebrate communities of streams: A case study in Liangjiang New Area, China. Luo K; Hu X; He Q; Wu Z; Cheng H; Hu Z; Mazumder A Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 621():1601-1614. PubMed ID: 29054671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Influences of environmental factors on macroinvertebrate assemblages: differences between mountain and lowland ecoregions, Wei River, China. Li S; Yang W; Wang L; Chen K; Xu S; Wang B Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Feb; 190(3):152. PubMed ID: 29460185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of metric scoring and health status classification methods to evaluate benthic macroinvertebrate-based index of biotic integrity performance in Poyang Lake wetland. You Q; Yang W; Jian M; Hu Q Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 761():144112. PubMed ID: 33360123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of coal mining, forestry, and road construction on southern Appalachian stream invertebrates and habitats. Gangloff MM; Perkins M; Blum PW; Walker C Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 55(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 25528595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Response of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessment indices to water chemistry in a mined Appalachian watershed. Freund JG; Petty JT Environ Manage; 2007 May; 39(5):707-20. PubMed ID: 17387548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A long-term, multitrophic level study to assess pulp and paper mill effluent effects on aquatic communities in four US receiving waters: characteristics of the study streams, sample sites, mills, and mill effluents. Hall TJ; Ragsdale RL; Arthurs WJ; Ikoma J; Borton DL; Cook DL Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Apr; 5(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 19063588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Unified Multimetric Index for the Evaluation of the Biological Condition of Streams in Southern Brazil Based on Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages. Ruaro R; Gubiani ÉA; Cunico AM; Higuti J; Moretto Y; Piana PA Environ Manage; 2019 Nov; 64(5):661-673. PubMed ID: 31591669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Use of physical, chemical, and biological indices to assess impacts of contaminants and physical habitat alteration in urban streams. Rogers CE; Brabander DJ; Barbour MT; Hemond HF Environ Toxicol Chem; 2002 Jun; 21(6):1156-67. PubMed ID: 12069298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Violin CR; Cada P; Sudduth EB; Hassett BA; Penrose DL; Bernhardt ES Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1932-49. PubMed ID: 21939035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biotic disturbance and benthic community dynamics in salmon-bearing streams. Moore JW; Schindler DE J Anim Ecol; 2008 Mar; 77(2):275-84. PubMed ID: 18081781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Response of macroinvertebrate communities to temporal dynamics of pesticide mixtures: A case study from the Sacramento River watershed, California. Chiu MC; Hunt L; Resh VH Environ Pollut; 2016 Dec; 219():89-98. PubMed ID: 27744143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Compliance of secondary production and eco-exergy as indicators of benthic macroinvertebrates assemblages' response to canopy cover conditions in Neotropical headwater streams. Linares MS; Callisto M; Marques JC Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():1543-1550. PubMed ID: 28882459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Variability of lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages and stream habitat characteristics across hierarchical landscape classifications. Mykrä H; Heino J; Muotka T Environ Manage; 2004 Sep; 34(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 15520891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Spatial-scale effects on relative importance of physical habitat predictors of stream health. Frimpong EA; Sutton TM; Engel BA; Simon TP Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 36(6):899-917. PubMed ID: 16261278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of mesohabitats on responses of invertebrate community structure in streams under different land uses. da Silva MV; Rosa BF; Alves RG Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Nov; 187(11):714. PubMed ID: 26514797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparing two periphyton collection methods commonly used for stream bioassessment and the development of numeric nutrient standards. Rodman AR; Scott JT Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):360. PubMed ID: 28660542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An evaluation of a bed instability index as an indicator of habitat quality in mountain streams of the northwestern United States. Kusnierz PC; Holbrook CM; Feldman DL Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Aug; 187(8):511. PubMed ID: 26189618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A fish-based index of biotic integrity to assess intermittent headwater streams in Wisconsin, USA. Lyons J Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Nov; 122(1-3):239-58. PubMed ID: 16770498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]