These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1955202)

  • 1. Explicit and implicit horizons for simulated landing approaches.
    Lintern G; Liu YT
    Hum Factors; 1991 Aug; 33(4):401-17. PubMed ID: 1955202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of scenery, lighting, glideslope, and experience on timing the landing flare.
    Palmisano S; Favelle S; Sachtler WL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):236-46. PubMed ID: 18808277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual misperception in aviation: glide path performance in a black hole environment.
    Gibb R; Schvaneveldt R; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Aug; 50(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 18767527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the visual perception of a runway model in pilots and nonpilots during simulated night landing approaches.
    Mertens HW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1978 Sep; 49(9):1043-55. PubMed ID: 697665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of runway image shape and approach angle magnitude by pilots in simulated night landing approaches.
    Mertens HW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1981 Jul; 52(7):373-86. PubMed ID: 7271667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different runway sizes on pilot performance during simulated night landing approaches.
    Mertens HW; Lewis MF
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 May; 53(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7092755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Runway width effects in the visual approach to landing.
    Galanis G; Jennings A; Beckett P
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 2001; 11(3):281-301. PubMed ID: 11858256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of aircraft control forces on pilot performance during instrument landings in a flight simulator.
    Hewson DJ; McNair PJ; Marshall RN
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Jul; 72(7):617-23. PubMed ID: 11471904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual scene properties relevant for simulating low-altitude flight: a multidimensional scaling approach.
    Kleiss JA
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):711-34. PubMed ID: 8851775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of three types of flight simulator visual scene detail on detection of altitude change.
    Kleiss JA; Hubbard DC
    Hum Factors; 1993 Dec; 35(4):653-71. PubMed ID: 8163280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aircraft control forces and EMG activity: comparison of novice and experienced pilots during simulated take-off and landing.
    Hewson DJ; McNair PJ; Marshall RN
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Aug; 70(8):745-51. PubMed ID: 10447046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of acoustic orientation cues on instrument flight performance in a flight simulator.
    Lyons TJ; Gillingham KK; Teas DC; Ercoline WR; Oakley C
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1990 Aug; 61(8):699-706. PubMed ID: 2400372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser projection versus a CRT display in the visual perception of aircraft aspect.
    Niall KK
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(4):630-43. PubMed ID: 12691370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual interference in implicit and explicit motor learning.
    Sekiya H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Oct; 103(2):333-43. PubMed ID: 17165396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pilot performance, strategy, and workload while executing approaches at steep angles and with lower landing minima.
    Boehm-Davis DA; Casali JG; Kleiner BM; Lancaster JA; Saleem JJ; Wochinger K
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):759-72. PubMed ID: 17915595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Landing Based on the Human Depth Perception in Limited Visibility and Failure of Avionic Systems.
    Mobini M; Sabzehparvar M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():4320101. PubMed ID: 35498171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. P300 as a measure of workload during a simulated aircraft landing task.
    Fowler B
    Hum Factors; 1994 Dec; 36(4):670-83. PubMed ID: 7661933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye position affects flight altitude in visual approach to landing independent of level of expertise of pilot.
    Jacobs DM; Morice AHP; Camachon C; Montagne G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197585. PubMed ID: 29795618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heart rate responses to real and simulated BA Hawk MK 51 flight.
    Ylönen H; Lyytinen H; Leino T; Leppäluoto J; Kuronen P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Jul; 68(7):601-5. PubMed ID: 9215465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
    Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.