These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19552367)

  • 1. Influence of matrix and insertion technique on the microleakage and microhardness of posterior composite restorations.
    Borges AB; Torres CR; Cassiano KV; Toyama RV; Pucci CR
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 19552367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Moosavi H; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of polymerization technique on microleakage and microhardness of resin composite restorations.
    Cavalcante LM; Peris AR; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 12670077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H; Tahvildarnejad N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 17277834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different application and polymerization techniques on the microleakage of proximal resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Brunton PA; Kassir A; Dashti M; Setcos JC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 14753333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A; Perry R
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 14677616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
    Cenci MS; Lund RG; Pereira CL; de Carvalho RM; Demarco FF
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.