These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Indirect bonding technique in lingual orthodontics: the HIRO system. Hiro T; Iglesia Fd; Andreu P Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):34-45. PubMed ID: 19350057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple and efficient procedure for indirect bonding. Cortesi R; Molinari L Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20974456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bonding techniques in lingual orthodontics. Paul W J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40 Suppl 1():S20-6. PubMed ID: 24005947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The AccuBond system for indirect orthodontic bonding. Alpern MC; Primus C; Alpern AH J Clin Orthod; 2009 Sep; 43(9):572-6; quiz 582. PubMed ID: 19904049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding. Smith RT; Shivapuja PK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):448-51. PubMed ID: 8480713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources. Koupis NS; Eliades T; Athanasiou AE Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 18298204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonding Agents: So Many Choices! Jablow M Dent Today; 2015 Feb; 34(2):96, 98, 100. PubMed ID: 26349255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Part II, an XPS and SEM study. Montasser MA; Drummond JL; Roth JR; Al-Turki L; Evans CA Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 18416615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives. Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regional bond strengths of a dual-cure resin core material to translucent quartz fiber post. Aksornmuang J; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16562347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrothermal bonding: shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after two weeks. Ward GJ; Mizrahi E; Cleaton-Jones PE Br J Orthod; 1998 May; 25(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9668995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Part I, a laboratory and clinical study. Montasser MA; Drummond JL; Evans CA Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 18416614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets. Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]