These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19552881)

  • 21. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
    Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Etching masks for precise indirect bonding.
    Cozzani M; Menini A; Bertelli A
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 May; 44(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 20831102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the Accuracy of Indirect Bonding with 3D Scanning Technology.
    El Nigoumi A
    J Clin Orthod; 2016 Oct; 50(10):613-619. PubMed ID: 27888654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of oxygen inhibition in indirect bonding with a hydrophilic adhesive.
    Soo PP; Green BM; Sondhi A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 19201329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The various families of composite adhesives: presentation and experimentation].
    Hitmi L; Attal JP; Degrange M
    Orthod Fr; 2002 Mar; 73(1):39-58. PubMed ID: 11987530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bisphenol A release from orthodontic adhesives and its correlation with the degree of conversion.
    Purushothaman D; Kailasam V; Chitharanjan AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25533069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The repair potential of resin composite materials.
    Maneenut C; Sakoolnamarka R; Tyas MJ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e20-7. PubMed ID: 20934745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a new nano-filled restorative material for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Soliman MM; Oonsombat C; Laffoon JF; Warren J
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 17373220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.
    Rinastiti M; Ozcan M; Siswomihardjo W; Busscher HJ
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19735692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial.
    Miles P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The direct way of indirect bonding--the combined effect.
    Gayake PV; Chitko SS; Sutrave N; Gaikwad PM
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 24358650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci.
    Lee SP; Lee SJ; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 19216592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Translucency, Stain Resistance, and Hardness of Composites Used for Invisalign Attachments.
    Feinberg KB; Souccar NM; Kau CH; Oster RA; Lawson NC
    J Clin Orthod; 2016 Mar; 50(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 27117736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations.
    Staxrud F; Dahl JE
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 21726294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adhesive dentistry: where are we today?
    Alex G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Feb; 26(2):150, 152-5. PubMed ID: 15948519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy.
    Sarafianou A; Seimenis I; Papadopoulos T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 18456049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Sari Z; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 15529507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.