These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19552883)

  • 41. A comparison of the shear-peel and third-order bond strengths of orthodontic brackets with 2 etch techniques and the role of bracket asymmetry.
    Gibb AJ; Katona TR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):699.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17169729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modified bonding technique for a standardized and effective indirect bonding procedure.
    Ciuffolo F; Tenisci N; Pollutri L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22464533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tensile bond strength of lingual orthodontic brackets with adhesive systems.
    Tuncer C; Ulusoy Ç
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 21491007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A practical method of fabricating a lingual retainer.
    Karaman AI; Polat O; Büyükyilmaz T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 12970668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A modified thermoplastic retainer.
    Pithon MM
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 23021123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Composite pontics for orthodontic patients with extraction spaces.
    Martins RP; Magno AF; Martins IP; Martins LP; White LW
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20552105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Salehi P; Zarif Najafi H; Roeinpeikar SM
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():25. PubMed ID: 24326013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Flowable resin for temporary fixation in bonding lingual retainers.
    Pithon MM
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 May; 49(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 26105180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial.
    Miles P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effect of acid conditioning of root canal dentin on the retention of adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts.
    Albashaireh ZS; Ghazal M; Kern M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):376-80. PubMed ID: 20178216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Indirect orthodontic bonding--a modified technique for improved efficiency and precision.
    Nojima LI; Araújo AS; Alves Júnior M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):109-17. PubMed ID: 26154464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Facilitating Direct Bonding for Lingual Retainers.
    Koerich L; Ruellas AC
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):37-8. PubMed ID: 26349288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Manchester positioner--dual retention made easy.
    Waring DT; Cappelli R
    J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 36(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19487741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surebonding indirect lingual retainers.
    Drake DL; Vicek RE; Bouillon J
    J Clin Orthod; 2002 Jan; 36(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 11887644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Shear bond strength of four different esthetic brackets.
    Salas GA; English JD; Salas AM; McGrory KR; Ontiveros JC; Powers JM; Frey GN
    Tex Dent J; 2008 Dec; 125(12):1148-52. PubMed ID: 19227110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vitro debonding of orthodontic retainers analyzed with finite element analysis.
    Milheiro A; de Jager N; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 25452631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Part I, a laboratory and clinical study.
    Montasser MA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 18416614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.