280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19553269)
1. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.
Thompson SG; Ashton HA; Gao L; Scott RA;
BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2307. PubMed ID: 19553269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial.
Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group
BMJ; 2002 Nov; 325(7373):1135. PubMed ID: 12433761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Kim LG; P Scott RA; Ashton HA; Thompson SG;
Ann Intern Med; 2007 May; 146(10):699-706. PubMed ID: 17502630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Ehlers L; Overvad K; Sørensen J; Christensen S; Bech M; Kjølby M
BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2243. PubMed ID: 19553267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.
Thompson SG; Bown MJ; Glover MJ; Jones E; Masconi KL; Michaels JA; Powell JT; Ulug P; Sweeting MJ
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(43):1-142. PubMed ID: 30132754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Thompson SG; Ashton HA; Gao L; Buxton MJ; Scott RA;
Br J Surg; 2012 Dec; 99(12):1649-56. PubMed ID: 23034729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness and cost of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a population screening program.
Wilmink AB; Quick CR; Hubbard CS; Day NE
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 38(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 12844092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management.
Svensjö S; Mani K; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 24485841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: do the benefits outweigh the costs?
Mason JM; Wakeman AP; Drummond MF; Crump BJ
J Public Health Med; 1993 Jun; 15(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 8353005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of the National Health Service Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme in England.
Glover MJ; Kim LG; Sweeting MJ; Thompson SG; Buxton MJ
Br J Surg; 2014 Jul; 101(8):976-82. PubMed ID: 24862963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
J Vasc Surg; 2006 May; 43(5):908-14; discussion 914. PubMed ID: 16678681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16893663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7494):750. PubMed ID: 15757960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of clinical benefit, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Sweeting MJ; Masconi KL; Jones E; Ulug P; Glover MJ; Michaels JA; Bown MJ; Powell JT; Thompson SG
Lancet; 2018 Aug; 392(10146):487-495. PubMed ID: 30057105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial.
Ashton HA; Buxton MJ; Day NE; Kim LG; Marteau TM; Scott RA; Thompson SG; Walker NM;
Lancet; 2002 Nov; 360(9345):1531-9. PubMed ID: 12443589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial.
Lindholt JS; Sørensen J; Søgaard R; Henneberg EW
Br J Surg; 2010 Jun; 97(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 20473995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revisiting the cost-effectiveness of screening 65-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on data from an implemented screening programme.
Hager J; Henriksson M; Carlsson P; Länne T; Lundgren F
Int Angiol; 2017 Dec; 36(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 27905693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Schmidt T; Mühlberger N; Chemelli-Steingruber IE; Strasak A; Kofler B; Chemelli A; Siebert U
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 20563953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic aneurysm surgery.
Daly KJ; Torella F; Ashleigh R; McCollum CN
Gerontology; 2004; 50(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 15477695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial.
Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Jan; 23(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 11748949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
