BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1955329)

  • 1. Monte Carlo calculation and silicon detector measurement of the hot particle dose.
    Chung MH; Levine SH; Jester WA
    Health Phys; 1991 Dec; 61(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 1955329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verification of the VARSKIN beta skin dose calculation computer code.
    Sherbini S; DeCicco J; Gray AT; Struckmeyer R
    Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 18469586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the photon dose calculation model in the VARSKIN 4 skin dose computer code.
    Sherbini S; Decicco J; Struckmeyer R; Saba M; Bush-Goddard S
    Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23111523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimising cylinder model dimensions for VARSKIN to simulate a droplet of radionuclide skin contamination using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
    James G; O'Brien J; Thomson B
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 May; 44(5):366-374. PubMed ID: 36897054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
    Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
    Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electron spectra measurements and Monte Carlo calculations for a 60Co standardised hot particle source.
    Villarreal-Barajas JE; Bowler MG; Charles MW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12918788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Amato E; Italiano A
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 29235449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
    Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculated effects of backscattering on skin dosimetry for nuclear fuel fragments.
    Aydarous ASh
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 18223183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
    Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of measured and calculated spatial dose distributions for a bench-mark 106Ru/106Rh hot particle source.
    Aydarous ASh; Charles MW; Darley PJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18083995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculation of the wall correction factors for ionization chambers and Aeq for 60Co gamma rays.
    Bond JE; Nath R; Schulz RJ
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 713976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of unfolding technique to HPGe detector using response functions calculated with the EGS4 Monte Carlo code.
    Chun KJ; Hah SH; Kim HM; Yoo GH
    J Radiat Res; 2006 Mar; 47(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 16571916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a silicon diode detector for skin dosimetry in radiotherapy.
    Vicoroski N; Espinoza A; Duncan M; Oborn BM; Carolan M; Metcalfe P; Menichelli D; Perevertaylo VL; Lerch MLF; Rosenfeld AB; Petasecca M
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5402-5412. PubMed ID: 28696500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new VARSKIN 4 photon skin dosimetry model.
    Hamby DM; Lodwick CJ; Palmer TS; Reese SR; Higley KA; Caffrey JA; Sherbini S; Saba M; Bush-Goddard SP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 23070483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the dose rate distribution for an air-type 60Co irradiation facility.
    Tsai WC; Sheu RD; Jiang SH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):352-8. PubMed ID: 16604659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New electron backscatter correction factors for accurate skin depth dose calculation from skin contamination by hot particles.
    Chibani O
    Health Phys; 2001 Oct; 81(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11569636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo dosimetry of CSA1 and CSA2 137Cs brachytherapy source models.
    Selvam TP; Sahoo S; Vishwakarma RS
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3870-9. PubMed ID: 19810459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of surface dose rate of indigenous (32)P patch brachytherapy source by experimental and Monte Carlo methods.
    Kumar S; Srinivasan P; Sharma SD; Saxena SK; Bakshi AK; Dash A; Babu DA; Sharma DN
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Sep; 103():120-7. PubMed ID: 26086681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.