549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19553853)
1. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA
Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 19076244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of different retention systems on a distal extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant.
Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Goiato MC; Gennari Filho H
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 20485037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
