These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19554823)

  • 1. Commentary on "Patients' concerns for family burden".
    Levine C
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 19554823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary on Berger's "Patients' concerns for family burden".
    DeRenzo EG
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 19554824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' concerns for family burden: a nonconforming preference in standards for surrogate decision making.
    Berger JT
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 19554821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When I lay my burden down: commentary on Berger.
    Derse AR
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 19554825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Berger on burdens.
    Nelson JL
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):162-4. PubMed ID: 19554822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics consultation and "facilitated" consensus.
    Adams DM
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 19385322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent without autonomy.
    Sulmasy DP
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):207-20. PubMed ID: 15868670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An inventory: the emerging rights of the physically ill family member.
    Snowden RF
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1973; 6():133-59. PubMed ID: 11664269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk.
    Eliott J; Olver I
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standards for family decisions: replacing best interests with harm prevention.
    Dresser R
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):54-5. PubMed ID: 12859819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: interpreting patient wishes.
    Lee H
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Jan; 23(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 24229502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient autonomy, assessment of competence and surrogate decision-making: a call for reasonableness in deciding for others.
    Baerøe K
    Bioethics; 2010 Feb; 24(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 18644014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preserving patient dignity when surrogates step in.
    Gold MF
    Provider; 2004 Jul; 30(7):28-9, 31-2, 35-7 passim. PubMed ID: 15354549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shattering the neutral surrogate myth in end-of-life decisionmaking: Terri Schiavo and her family.
    Shepherd L
    Cumberland Law Rev; 2004-2005; 35(3):575-95. PubMed ID: 16715563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case study. Conflicting beliefs. Commentary.
    Mukherjee D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2010; 40(4):15. PubMed ID: 20672461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: the need for more questions.
    Mendola A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Jan; 23(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 24229509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Religious belief and surrogate medical decision making.
    Eskew S; Meyers C
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 19554828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What families say about surrogacy: a response to "autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions".
    Nelson JL; Lindemann H
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):219-26; discussion 233-4. PubMed ID: 18051938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who's the patient?
    Minow M
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1173-92. PubMed ID: 12599350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment.
    Ross LF
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22. PubMed ID: 19460233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.