BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19554862)

  • 1. Assessing the safety and cost-effectiveness of early nanodrugs.
    Vines T; Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2009 May; 16(5):822-45. PubMed ID: 19554862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
    Lopert R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme and implications for paediatric prescribing.
    Sinha Y; Brien JA; Craig JC
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2009 Jun; 45(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 19490409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Governments Need Better Guidance to Maximise Value for Money: The Case of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.
    Carter D; Vogan A; Haji Ali Afzali H
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 14(4):401-407. PubMed ID: 26818196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of a decision by the Medical Services Advisory Committee based on health technology assessment of an emerging technology: the case for remotely assisted radical prostatectomy.
    O'Malley SP; Jordan E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 17493316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Medicine and Medical Devices Safety Authority in evaluating complementary and alternative medicines in Australia and New Zealand.
    Ghosh D; Skinner M; Ferguson LR
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 16481089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Technology Assessment in Australia: The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and Medical Services Advisory Committee.
    Kim H; Byrnes J; Goodall S;
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2021 May; 24():6-11. PubMed ID: 33429153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
    Lexchin J; Mintzes B
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004.
    Harris AH; Hill SR; Chin G; Li JJ; Walkom E
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):713-22. PubMed ID: 18378939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of pharmacoeconomic guidelines for formulary approval: the Australian experience.
    Langley PC
    Clin Ther; 1993; 15(6):1154-76; discussion 1120. PubMed ID: 8111812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lipid excipients and delivery systems for pharmaceutical development: a regulatory perspective.
    Chen ML
    Adv Drug Deliv Rev; 2008 Mar; 60(6):768-77. PubMed ID: 18077051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Australia's 'fourth hurdle' drug review comparing costs and benefits holds lessons for the United States.
    Lopert R; Elshaug AG
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Apr; 32(4):778-87. PubMed ID: 23569059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent legal developments and the authority of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration.
    Shirlow E; Faunce T
    J Law Med; 2009 May; 16(5):764-9. PubMed ID: 19554858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA.
    Turkstra E; Bettington E; Donohue ML; Mervin MC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(4):521-528. PubMed ID: 28703092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Australian pharmaceutical policy: price control, equity, and drug innovation in Australia.
    Doran E; Alexander Henry D
    J Public Health Policy; 2008 Apr; 29(1):106-20. PubMed ID: 18368023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial limits reviewed: the basis for unique Australian regulatory requirements for microbial quality of non-sterile pharmaceuticals.
    Tang S
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(3):100-9. PubMed ID: 9691672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generic substitution: the use of medicinal products containing different salts and implications for safety and efficacy.
    Verbeeck RK; Kanfer I; Walker RB
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2006 May; 28(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 16413762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the Quality of the Clinical Evidence in Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee: Fit for Purpose?
    Wonder M; Dunlop S
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 26091601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delays in access to affordable medicines: putting policy into perspective.
    Pearce A; van Gool K; Haywood P; Haas M
    Aust Health Rev; 2012 Nov; 36(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 23062753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.