These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19555920)

  • 1. Playing TETRIS for science counter-regulatory affective processing in a motivationally "hot" context.
    Wentura D; Voss A; Rothermund K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 19555920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incongruency effects in affective processing: automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience?
    Rothermund K; Gast A; Wentura D
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Apr; 25(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 21432683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: a basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in emotion and motivation.
    Rothermund K; Voss A; Wentura D
    Emotion; 2008 Feb; 8(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 18266514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity.
    Gable P; Harmon-Jones E
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 20424047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task.
    Briggs KE; Martin FH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 19232373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control.
    Boot WR; Kramer AF; Simons DJ; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 18929349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional consequences of pregoal and postgoal positive affects.
    Gable PA; Harmon-Jones E
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1358-67. PubMed ID: 22023362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.
    Schwager S; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(5):839-55. PubMed ID: 23237331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Looking at the bright side: the affective monitoring of direction.
    Phaf RH; Rotteveel M
    Emotion; 2009 Oct; 9(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 19803594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitude, subjective behavioral competence and emotions].
    Doll J; Mentz M; Orth B
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):539-59. PubMed ID: 1785209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: Evidence in the additional singleton paradigm.
    Wentura D; Müller P; Rothermund K; Voss A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 28376664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of constraints in expert memory.
    Gobet F; Waters AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1082-94. PubMed ID: 14622048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Being moved: valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions.
    Krieglmeyer R; Deutsch R; De Houwer J; De Raedt R
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20424109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):477-86. PubMed ID: 19271860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Goal priming and the emotional experience of students with and without attention problems: an application of the emotional stroop task.
    Sideridis G; Vansteenkiste M; Shiakalli M; Georgiou M; Irakleous I; Tsigourla I; Fragioudaki E
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 19251586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive and motivational inhibition: associations with self-report measures related to inhibition.
    Shuster J; Toplak ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 19233688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic and affective salience: the role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement.
    Biggs AT; Kreager RD; Gibson BS; Villano M; Crowell CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 22390289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers?
    Bradley BP; Field M; Healy H; Mogg K
    J Psychopharmacol; 2008 Sep; 22(7):737-45. PubMed ID: 18208922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent.
    Bamford S; Ward R
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18410191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.