These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19557510)

  • 21. The influence of model parameters on the inverse solution based on MEGs and EEGs.
    Peters MJ; De Munck JC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():61-8; discussion 69. PubMed ID: 1814156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG.
    Andersen LM; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Riaz B; Winkler D; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117157. PubMed ID: 32659354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design.
    Iivanainen J; Mäkinen AJ; Zetter R; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118747. PubMed ID: 34852277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seeing through the skull: advanced EEGs use MRIs to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp.
    Gevins A; Le J; Brickett P; Reutter B; Desmond J
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 1793686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time-coherent expansion of MEG/EEG cortical sources.
    David O; Garnero L
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1277-89. PubMed ID: 12414267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modelling the magnetic signature of neuronal tissue.
    Blagoev KB; Mihaila B; Travis BJ; Alexandrov LB; Bishop AR; Ranken D; Posse S; Gasparovic C; Mayer A; Aine CJ; Ulbert I; Morita M; Müller W; Connor J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy and applications of group MEG studies using cortical source locations estimated from participants' scalp surfaces.
    Holliday IE; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Singh KD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2003 Nov; 20(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 14601140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Propagation of epileptic spikes reconstructed from spatiotemporal magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic source analysis.
    Tanaka N; Hämäläinen MS; Ahlfors SP; Liu H; Madsen JR; Bourgeois BF; Lee JW; Dworetzky BA; Belliveau JW; Stufflebeam SM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Mar; 50(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 20006721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
    Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical source estimate of combined high resolution EEG and fMRI data related to voluntary movements.
    Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Del Gratta C; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Cincotti F
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 12501818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial patterning of the neonatal EEG suggests a need for a high number of electrodes.
    Odabaee M; Freeman WJ; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2013 Mar; 68():229-35. PubMed ID: 23246993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cortical potential imaging study from simultaneous extra- and intracranial electrical recordings by means of the finite element method.
    Zhang Y; Ding L; van Drongelen W; Hecox K; Frim DM; He B
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1513-24. PubMed ID: 16631381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.