148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19558307)
1. Obesity, gynecological factors, and abnormal mammography follow-up in minority and medically underserved women.
Fair AM; Wujcik D; Lin JM; Grau A; Wilson V; Champion V; Zheng W; Egan KM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Jul; 18(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19558307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Jacobs A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 16796480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing is everything: methodologic issues locating and recruiting medically underserved women for abnormal mammography follow-up research.
Fair AM; Wujcik D; Lin JM; Egan KM; Grau AM; Zheng W
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 18289943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships of Family History-related Factors and Causal Beliefs to Cancer Risk Perception and Mammography Screening Adherence Among Medically Underserved Women.
Hong SJ; Goodman M; Kaphingst KA
J Health Commun; 2020 Jul; 25(7):531-542. PubMed ID: 32673182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Realizing the promise of breast cancer screening: clinical follow-up after abnormal screening among Black women.
Kerner JF; Yedidia M; Padgett D; Muth B; Washington KS; Tefft M; Yabroff KR; Makariou E; Freeman H; Mandelblatt JS
Prev Med; 2003 Aug; 37(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 12855208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delay in diagnostic testing after abnormal mammography in low-income women.
Wujcik D; Shyr Y; Li M; Clayton MF; Ellington L; Menon U; Mooney K
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Nov; 36(6):709-15. PubMed ID: 19887359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adherence to screening guidelines for breast and cervical cancer in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease: an ancillary study of volunteers for hers.
Castellano PZ; Wenger NK; Graves WL
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2001 Jun; 10(5):451-61. PubMed ID: 11445044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.
Fair AM; Wujcik D; Lin JM; Zheng W; Egan KM; Grau AM; Champion VL; Wallston KA
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2010 Feb; 21(1 Suppl):71-94. PubMed ID: 20173286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compliance and self-reported barriers to follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms among women utilizing a county mobile mammography van.
Peek ME; Han JH
Health Care Women Int; 2009 Oct; 30(10):857-70. PubMed ID: 19742361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobile mammography: assessment of self-referral in reaching medically underserved women.
Peek ME; Han J
J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Apr; 99(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 17444429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Latinas with abnormal breast findings: patient predictors of timely diagnostic resolution.
Mojica CM; Bastani R; Ponce NA; Boscardin WJ
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007 Dec; 16(10):1468-77. PubMed ID: 18062762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Risk in Sexual Minority Women during Routine Screening at an Urban LGBT Health Center.
Clavelle K; King D; Bazzi AR; Fein-Zachary V; Potter J
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 26060123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of Telephone Communication on Patient Adherence With Follow-Up Recommendations After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram.
Nguyen DL; Oluyemi E; Myers KS; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Sep; 17(9):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 32353352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to recent screening mammography among Latinas: findings from the California Women's Health Survey.
Mack KP; Pavao J; Tabnak F; Knutson K; Kimerling R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 19281318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Weighing in' on screening mammography.
Berz D; Sikov W; Colvin G; Weitzen S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Apr; 114(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18491226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms.
Karliner LS; Ma L; Hofmann M; Kerlikowske K
Med Care; 2012 Feb; 50(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 21993060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Different Intensities of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Mammography.
Glassgow AE; Molina Y; Kim S; Campbell RT; Darnell J; Calhoun EA
Health Promot Pract; 2019 Nov; 20(6):914-921. PubMed ID: 29907079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
