155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19558470)
1. Comparison of three plating media for the isolation of Salmonella from poultry environmental samples in Great Britain using ISO 6579:2002 (Annex D).
Carrique-Mas JJ; Barnes S; McLaren I; Davies R
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):1976-83. PubMed ID: 19558470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of selective culture media for the isolation of Salmonella from poultry].
Yuño MM; Terzolo HR; Fernández HD; Malena RC; Altuna ME
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1995; 27(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 8552759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of six culture media for isolation of Salmonella species from stool samples.
Ruiz J; Núñez ML; Lorente I; Pérez J; Simarro E; Gómez J
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Dec; 15(12):922-6. PubMed ID: 9031874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of culture media for detecting airborne Salmonella enteritidis collected with an electrostatic sampling device from the environment of experimentally infected laying hens.
Gast RK; Mitchell BW; Holt PS
Poult Sci; 2004 Jul; 83(7):1106-11. PubMed ID: 15285500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of delayed secondary enrichment for the isolation of Salmonella in poultry and poultry environments.
Waltman WD; Horne AM; Pirkle C; Dickson TG
Avian Dis; 1991; 35(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 2029264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.
Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of Rambach and NBGL agar on 4037 stools of human origin and 584 veterinary samples submitted for isolation of Salmonellae.
Poisson DM; Nugier JP; Rousseau P
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1993 Jun; 41(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 8247634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella species including three new chromogenic plating media.
Schönenbrücher V; Mallinson ET; Bülte M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18192050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of sampling methods to detect Salmonella infection of turkey flocks.
Mueller-Doblies D; Sayers AR; Carrique-Mas JJ; Davies RH
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 107(2):635-45. PubMed ID: 19302307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 2 culture methods and PCR assays for Salmonella detection in poultry feces.
Soria MC; Soria MA; Bueno DJ
Poult Sci; 2012 Mar; 91(3):616-26. PubMed ID: 22334736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Xylose-lysine-tergitol 4: an improved selective agar medium for the isolation of Salmonella.
Miller RG; Tate CR; Mallinson ET; Scherrer JA
Poult Sci; 1991 Dec; 70(12):2429-32. PubMed ID: 1784564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of five new plating media for isolation of Salmonella species.
Dusch H; Altwegg M
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):802-4. PubMed ID: 7790441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces.
Voogt N; Raes M; Wannet WJ; Henken AM; van de Giessen AW
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 32(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 11169049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV) and automated conductance in combination with Rambach agar for Salmonella detection in environmental samples of a milk powder factory.
Joosten HM; van Dijck WG; van der Velde F
Int J Food Microbiol; 1994 May; 22(2-3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8074972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isolation of Salmonella from environmental samples collected in the reptile department of Antwerp Zoo using different selective methods.
Bauwens L; Vercammen F; Bertrand S; Collard JM; De Ceuster S
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 101(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 16882135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ring-trial results for the cultural detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces].
Malorny B; Dorn C; Schroeter A; Käsbohrer A; Helmuth R
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007; 120(7-8):334-9. PubMed ID: 17715826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples.
Petersen L
Acta Vet Scand; 1997; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 9129349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples.
Read SC; Irwin RJ; Poppe C; Harris J
Poult Sci; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1617-21. PubMed ID: 7816738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of two assays, MSRV and RV, for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from wastewater samples and broiler chickens.
Zdragas A; Tsakos P; Mavrogeni P
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 31(4):328-31. PubMed ID: 11068917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between a cultural procedure using Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and motility enrichments on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for Salmonella detection from food and feed.
Wiberg C; Norberg P
Int J Food Microbiol; 1996 Apr; 29(2-3):353-60. PubMed ID: 8796434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
