BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1955919)

  • 1. Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely atrophied maxilla: a preliminary report.
    Jensen J; Sindet-Pedersen S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Dec; 49(12):1277-87. PubMed ID: 1955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
    Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Follow-up studies of 3-dimensional osteoplastic reconstruction of the extremely atrophied maxilla combined with implants].
    Reinert S; König S; Eufinger H; Bremerich A
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 10414079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
    Kamal D; Abida S; Jammet P; Goudot P; Yachouh J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement.
    Cordaro L; Amadé DS; Cordaro M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 12005140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with autogenous bone, platelet-rich plasma, and implants: 1-year results of a controlled prospective 5-year study.
    Thor A; Wannfors K; Sennerby L; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 16336912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morbidity and complications of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants.
    Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Timmenga NM; Vissink A; Reintsema H
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S65-9. PubMed ID: 10414086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M; Casentini P; Zaniboni M; Corsi E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-124 months.
    Raghoebar GM; Timmenga NM; Reintsema H; Stegenga B; Vissink A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11359486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Augmentation of the extremely atrophied maxilla and mandible by autologous calvarial bone transplantation].
    Lenzen C; Meiss A; Bull HG
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S40-2. PubMed ID: 10414081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].
    Tang ZH; Lv H; Cao MX; Wu MJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 20140053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced residual ridge resorption: surgical management.
    Tolman DE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 8329087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant reconstruction of the bone-grafted maxilla: review of the literature and presentation of 8 cases.
    Clayman L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):674-82. PubMed ID: 16546648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density: a possible method for identifying early implant failures?
    Johansson B; Bäck T; Hirsch JM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15595704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.
    Barone A; Varanini P; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
    Tolstunov L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up.
    Sbordone L; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris G; Sbordone C; Guidetti F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):695-703. PubMed ID: 19885411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of bone grafting and placement of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla.
    Reinert S; König S; Bremerich A; Eufinger H; Krimmel M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 41(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 12946668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate dental implant placement in calvarial bone grafts to rehabilitate the severely resorbed edentulous maxilla: A prospective pilot study.
    Putters TF; Raghoebar GM; Klein-Nulend J; Vissink A; Schortinghuis J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30514603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.