These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19559561)

  • 1. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
    Kurtz WB; Ecker TM; Reichmann WM; Murphy SB
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
    Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26224610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tabata T; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomic stem inserted according to native anteversion could reproduce the native anterior distance of the femoral head and decrease bony impingement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yoshitani J; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Ueno T; Ueoka K; Yamamuro Y; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2020 Feb; 44(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 31456058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Harvey N; Zaragoza E; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17259408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis.
    Abraham E; Gonzalez MH; Pratap S; Amirouche F; Atluri P; Simon P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(7):788-95. PubMed ID: 17878786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rotational acetabular osteotomy with resection of the capital drop and double floor for advanced osteoarthritis of the hip.
    Nakamura Y; Ohishi H; Kishiya M
    Hip Int; 2013; 23(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 23397195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases.
    Lavigne M; Rama KR; Roy A; Vendittoli PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1074-9. PubMed ID: 18534499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impingement with total hip replacement.
    Malik A; Maheshwari A; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1832-42. PubMed ID: 17671025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fate of osteophytes in the superolateral region of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty.
    Mao Y; Yu D; Xu C; Liu F; Li H; Zhu Z
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2262-6. PubMed ID: 24851785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spontaneous dissociation of offset, face-changing polyethylene liners from the acetabular shell: a report of four cases.
    Gray CF; Moore RE; Lee GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):841-5. PubMed ID: 22552674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Double acetabular wall--a misleading point for hip arthroplasty: an anatomical, radiological, clinical study.
    Madadi F; Yazdanshenas H; Madadi F; Bazargan-Hejazi S
    Int Orthop; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1007-11. PubMed ID: 23436163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
    Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Murakami H; Mifuji K; Sawa M; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Ochi M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep; 99-B(9):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 28860392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty.
    Odri GA; Padiolleau GB; Gouin FT
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 23927907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Matsushita A; Nakashima Y; Jingushi S; Yamamoto T; Kuraoka A; Iwamoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):646-51. PubMed ID: 18534445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Vigdorchik JM; Sharma AK; Elbuluk AM; Carroll KM; Mayman DJ; Lieberman JR
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):210-216. PubMed ID: 32741711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB; Wagle RR; Usrey MM; Thompson MT; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.