BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19559796)

  • 1. Improvement of brain segmentation accuracy by optimizing non-uniformity correction using N3.
    Zheng W; Chee MW; Zagorodnov V
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 48(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 19559796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topology-corrected segmentation and local intensity estimates for improved partial volume classification of brain cortex in MRI.
    Rueda A; Acosta O; Couprie M; Bourgeat P; Fripp J; Dowson N; Romero E; Salvado O
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 May; 188(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 20193712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synthetic T1-weighted brain image generation with incorporated coil intensity correction using DESPOT1.
    Deoni SC; Rutt BK; Peters TM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 17071345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Projection-based estimation and nonuniformity correction of sensitivity profiles in phased-array surface coils.
    Yun S; Kyriakos WE; Chung JY; Han Y; Yoo SS; Park H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):588-97. PubMed ID: 17326086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.
    Chao WH; Chen YY; Lin SH; Shih YY; Tsang S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Mar; 33(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 19097854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving segmentation accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging using a boosted decision tree.
    Chao WH; Chen YY; Cho CW; Lin SH; Shih YY; Tsang S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Nov; 175(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 18786567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intensity correction with a pair of spoiled gradient recalled echo images.
    Noterdaeme O; Anderson M; Gleeson F; Brady SM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3473-89. PubMed ID: 19436101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of spectral integration and normalization in NMR-based metabonomic analyses.
    Webb-Robertson BJ; Lowry DF; Jarman KH; Harbo SJ; Meng QR; Fuciarelli AF; Pounds JG; Lee KM
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2005 Sep; 39(3-4):830-6. PubMed ID: 15990265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing parameter choice for FSL-Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis.
    Popescu V; Battaglini M; Hoogstrate WS; Verfaillie SC; Sluimer IC; van Schijndel RA; van Dijk BW; Cover KS; Knol DL; Jenkinson M; Barkhof F; de Stefano N; Vrenken H;
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 22484407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.
    Sled JG; Zijdenbos AP; Evans AC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Feb; 17(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 9617910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.
    Boyes RG; Gunter JL; Frost C; Janke AL; Yeatman T; Hill DL; Bernstein MA; Thompson PM; Weiner MW; Schuff N; Alexander GE; Killiany RJ; DeCarli C; Jack CR; Fox NC;
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1752-62. PubMed ID: 18063391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of performance metrics for bias field correction in MR brain images.
    Chua ZY; Zheng W; Chee MW; Zagorodnov V
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 19472380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of gradient non-linearity correction and intensity non-uniformity correction in longitudinal studies using structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy (SIENA).
    Takao H; Abe O; Hayashi N; Kabasawa H; Ohtomo K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Aug; 32(2):489-92. PubMed ID: 20677282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity inhomogeneity correction using N3 on mouse brain magnetic resonance microscopy.
    Lin L; Wu S; Bin G; Yang C
    J Neuroimaging; 2013 Oct; 23(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 23895576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic correction of intensity inhomogeneities improves unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI.
    Positano V; Cusi K; Santarelli MF; Sironi A; Petz R; Defronzo R; Landini L; Gastaldelli A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 18666138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesion subtypes with multichannel MRI.
    Wu Y; Warfield SK; Tan IL; Wells WM; Meier DS; van Schijndel RA; Barkhof F; Guttmann CR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1205-15. PubMed ID: 16797188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construction and assessment of a 3-T MRI brain template.
    Lalys F; Haegelen C; Ferre JC; El-Ganaoui O; Jannin P
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):345-54. PubMed ID: 19682582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI.
    Styner M; Brechbühler C; Székely G; Gerig G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Mar; 19(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 10875700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of six algorithms for correcting intensity nonuniformity effects.
    Arnold JB; Liow JS; Schaper KA; Stern JJ; Sled JG; Shattuck DW; Worth AJ; Cohen MS; Leahy RM; Mazziotta JC; Rottenberg DA
    Neuroimage; 2001 May; 13(5):931-43. PubMed ID: 11304088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of 3D DCE-MRI of the kidneys using non-rigid image registration and segmentation of voxel time courses.
    Zöllner FG; Sance R; Rogelj P; Ledesma-Carbayo MJ; Rørvik J; Santos A; Lundervold A
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 19135861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.