These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19560061)

  • 1. www.X-rayRisk.com: an online calculator for cancer risk.
    Hanley M; Koonce JD; Bradshaw ML
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jul; 6(7):475-6. PubMed ID: 19560061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetry for epidemiological studies: learning from the past, looking to the future.
    Simon SL; Bouville A; Kleinerman R; Ron E
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):313-8. PubMed ID: 16808617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EPRI EDE calculator--a software package for assessing effective dose equivalent from hot particles on the skin.
    Xu XG; Su H; Bushart S
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 16966881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT: radiation overdose?
    Hughes J
    Radiol Technol; 2008 Sep; 80(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 18796575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel tool for user-friendly estimation of natural, diagnostic and professional radiation risk: Radio-Risk software.
    Carpeggiani C; Paterni M; Caramella D; Vano E; Semelka RC; Picano E
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3563-7. PubMed ID: 21820256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The CT dose and utilization controversy: the radiologist's response.
    Boland GW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):696-8. PubMed ID: 18514947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GENII-LIN-2.1: an open source software system for calculating radiation dose and risk from radionuclides released to the environment.
    Teodori F; Sumini M
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):589-601. PubMed ID: 19029591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
    Leonard BE
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. BrightStat.com: free statistics online.
    Stricker D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 18653259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is my cancer risk? Identifying how Internet-based cancer risk calculators convey individualized risk estimates to the public.
    Waters EA; Sullivan HW; Nelson W; Hesse BW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():1168. PubMed ID: 18998855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regarding the patient dosimetry and cancer risk associated with performing computed tomography coronary angiography.
    Castronovo FP
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(2):157-8. PubMed ID: 18371584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are CT scans carcinogenic?
    Mezrich R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 18514945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic CT radiation and cancer induction.
    Richards PJ; George J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 May; 39(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 19953245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multifactorial study of the risk of lung cancer among French uranium miners: radon, smoking and silicosis.
    Amabile JC; Leuraud K; Vacquier B; Caër-Lorho S; Acker A; Laurier D
    Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 19901596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automation: humans versus machines?
    McDonald JC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):467-8. PubMed ID: 15995252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Osei EK; Barnett R
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 19690363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating radiation dose assessments into the ACR appropriateness criteria.
    Schueler BA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):775-6. PubMed ID: 18514960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General situation of radiation accidents in China.
    Li Z; Wenyi Z; Liang'an Z
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 17561521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.