179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19560090)
1. Multiple monophasic shocks improve electrotherapy of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model of chronic infarction.
Li W; Ripplinger CM; Lou Q; Efimov IR
Heart Rhythm; 2009 Jul; 6(7):1020-7. PubMed ID: 19560090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Panoramic imaging reveals basic mechanisms of induction and termination of ventricular tachycardia in rabbit heart with chronic infarction: implications for low-voltage cardioversion.
Ripplinger CM; Lou Q; Li W; Hadley J; Efimov IR
Heart Rhythm; 2009 Jan; 6(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 18996057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanisms of unpinning and termination of ventricular tachycardia.
Ripplinger CM; Krinsky VI; Nikolski VP; Efimov IR
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2006 Jul; 291(1):H184-92. PubMed ID: 16501014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel low-energy electrotherapy that terminates ventricular tachycardia with lower energy than a biphasic shock when antitachycardia pacing fails.
Janardhan AH; Li W; Fedorov VV; Yeung M; Wallendorf MJ; Schuessler RB; Efimov IR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Dec; 60(23):2393-8. PubMed ID: 23141483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead system.
Saksena S; Luceri R; Krol RB; Brownstein S; Burkhardt E; Accorti P; Brewer G; Scott S; Callaghan F; Livingston A
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8456763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy.
Ambrosi CM; Ripplinger CM; Efimov IR; Fedorov VV
Heart Rhythm; 2011 Jan; 8(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 20969974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.
Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators.
Greene HL; DiMarco JP; Kudenchuk PJ; Scheinman MM; Tang AS; Reiter MJ; Echt DS; Chapman PD; Jazayeri MR; Chapman FW
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 75(16):1135-9. PubMed ID: 7762500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.
Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev T; Tchou PJ
Circ Res; 1998 May; 82(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 9576111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Progressive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies for ventricular tachycardia: The efficacy and safety of multiple bursts, ramps, and low-energy shocks.
Strik M; Ramirez FD; Welte N; Bonnin T; Abu-Alrub S; Eschalier R; Haïssaguerre M; Ritter P; Ploux S; Bordachar P
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Dec; 17(12):2072-2077. PubMed ID: 32739474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia.
Qian S; Connolly A; Mendonca-Costa C; Campos F; Williams SE; Whitaker J; Rinaldi CA; Bishop MJ
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Dec; 139():104987. PubMed ID: 34741904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of shock timing on efficacy and safety of internal cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia.
Li HG; Yee R; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Klein GJ; Zardini M; Thakur RK; Morillo CA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):703-8. PubMed ID: 8077542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.
Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Goyal R; Chan KK; Bogun F; Castellani M; Harvey M; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Man KC; Morady F
Am Heart J; 1996 May; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:
Khaykin Y; Newman D; Kowalewski M; Korley V; Dorian P
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):868-72. PubMed ID: 12890051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose-Dependent Effects of Ranolazine on Reentrant Ventricular Arrhythmias Induced After Subacute Myocardial Infarction in Rabbits.
Moschovidis V; Simopoulos V; Stravela S; Dipla K; Hatziefthimiou A; Stamatiou R; Aidonidis I
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 31242756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized repeat-crossover comparison of antitachycardia pacing with low-energy cardioversion.
Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Kelso D; Mitchell R
Circulation; 1993 Jun; 87(6):1889-96. PubMed ID: 8504501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Faddy SC; Powell J; Craig JC
Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12867304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
